Dawsey–Russell–Urban Partition Polynomial Derivative Question
Abstract
The partitions (1,1) and (2) refute the printed derivative-separation question.
Definition 1.1 (The partition polynomial).
Formalization. D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.partitionPolynomial (✓ std3).
Citation. Madeline Locus Dawsey; Tyler Russell; Dannie Urban (2022). Derivatives and Integrals of Polynomials Associated with Integer Partitions. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.00943. URL: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL25/Dawsey/dawsey3.pdf.
Commentary.
For a partition l of n, the integer polynomial is the multiset sum of X^i over all parts i of l. Repeated equal parts contribute repeated monomials, so a part i of multiplicity m_i contributes m_i times X^i.
Definition 1.2 (The largest part).
Formalization. D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.largestPart (✓ std3).
Citation. Madeline Locus Dawsey; Tyler Russell; Dannie Urban (2022). Derivatives and Integrals of Polynomials Associated with Integer Partitions. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.00943. URL: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL25/Dawsey/dawsey3.pdf.
Commentary.
The value largestPart(l) is the supremum of the multiset of parts, hence the largest part of a nonempty partition and zero for the empty partition of zero.
Definition 1.3 (Question 9 as printed).
Formalization. D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.claim (✓ std3).
Citation. Madeline Locus Dawsey; Tyler Russell; Dannie Urban (2022). Derivatives and Integrals of Polynomials Associated with Integer Partitions. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.00943. URL: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL25/Dawsey/dawsey3.pdf.
Commentary.
Question 9 asks: “If λ, λ′ are any two unequal partitions, is it true that f_λ^{(d)}(1) ≠ f_{λ′}^{(d)}(1) for some positive integer d ≤ min{lg(λ), lg(λ′)}?” The superscript (d) denotes the d-th formal derivative. The quantifiers permit different sizes and lengths.
Theorem 1.4 (The printed question has a negative answer).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.result (✓ std3). ∎
Resolves. Problems/dawsey-russell-urban-partition-polynomial-derivative-question-refutation (refuted) by D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.result.
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. Madeline Locus Dawsey; Tyler Russell; Dannie Urban (2022). Derivatives and Integrals of Polynomials Associated with Integer Partitions. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.00943. URL: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL25/Dawsey/dawsey3.pdf.
Commentary.
The unequal partitions (1,1) and (2) both partition 2. Their largest parts are 1 and 2, so the only admissible positive derivative order is 1. Their partition polynomials are 2X and X^2, and both first derivatives evaluate to 2 at 1. This refutes the printed universal assertion and makes no claim about the same-length reading.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.claim - Truth anchor:
D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.largestPart - Truth anchor:
D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.partitionPolynomial - Truth anchor:
D5/S0/Certificates/DawseyPartitionPolynomialDerivativeQuestionRefutation.result