Weighted Bond Difference Counterexample
Abstract
Three disjoint triangles and three spanning paths refute Conjecture 4.13(2).
Definition 1.1 (The literal all-graphs conjecture).
Formalization. D5/S0/Certificates/GonzalezDLeonWachsWeightedBondDifferenceRefutation.claim (✓ std3).
Citation. Rafael S. Gonzalez D’Leon; Michelle L. Wachs (2026). Weighted bond posets and a new chromatic symmetric function. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.08692. URL: https://arxiv.org/html/2608.08692v1#S4.Thmtheorem13.
Commentary.
For every finite graph G and spanning subgraph H with the same number of connected components, the sign-corrected difference of their literal source Mobius polynomials is asserted to split over the reals. This is part (2) as written; no connected-only premise is added.
Theorem 1.2 (The nine-vertex witness refutes part (2)).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S0/Certificates/GonzalezDLeonWachsWeightedBondDifferenceRefutation.result (✓ std3). ∎
Resolves. Problems/gonzalez-dleon-wachs-conjecture-4-13-2-refutation (refuted) by D5/S0/Certificates/GonzalezDLeonWachsWeightedBondDifferenceRefutation.result.
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. Rafael S. Gonzalez D’Leon; Michelle L. Wachs (2026). Weighted bond posets and a new chromatic symmetric function. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.08692. URL: https://arxiv.org/html/2608.08692v1#S4.Thmtheorem13.
Commentary.
On Fin 3 x Fin 3, G is three triangle fibers and H is three path fibers. Both have three components and H is proper. Restriction and gluing give the source-poset product, hence polynomials A^3 and B^3. Their difference is (X+1)^2 times a quartic with no real root, so it does not split.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S0/Certificates/GonzalezDLeonWachsWeightedBondDifferenceRefutation.claim - Truth anchor:
D5/S0/Certificates/GonzalezDLeonWachsWeightedBondDifferenceRefutation.result - Dependency: D5/S0/Certificates/GonzalezDLeonWachsThreeVertexMobius