Full binary lifts over the balanced base
Abstract
Full binary lifts over the balanced base.
Definition 1.1 (splitting).
Lean statement: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting
Formalization. D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For every k and every bipermutative binary block code of length k+2, the full inverse image of the same fixed balancedSubshift is homeomorphic to BalancedPoint times the literal prefix set Fin(k+1) to Bool. The whole inverse image and every prefix are retained. For a source x with coded image y, the transformed prefix label β(y)^(-1)(sourcePrefix x) is valued in that original prefix set.
Theorem 1.2 (splitting_conjugacy).
Lean statement: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_conjugacy
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_conjugacy (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The homeomorphism conjugates the actual lift shift to the balanced base shift and fixes the transformed prefix label β(y)^(-1)(sourcePrefix x), valued in the original prefix set.
Theorem 1.3 (splitting_fibre_invariant).
Lean statement: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_fibre_invariant
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_fibre_invariant (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Every signed integer iterate preserves the transformed prefix label β(y)^(-1)(sourcePrefix x), valued in the original prefix set.
Theorem 1.4 (splitting_fibre_clopen).
Lean statement: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_fibre_clopen
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_fibre_clopen (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Each actual fibre is clopen, by continuity and discreteness of the prefix set.
Theorem 1.5 (full_lift_not_minimal).
Lean statement: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.full_lift_not_minimal
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.full_lift_not_minimal (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Two distinct constant prefixes yield distinct nonempty closed invariant fibres, so the entire inverse image is nonminimal. Exact minimal component count is not asserted here.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.full_lift_not_minimal - Truth anchor:
D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting - Truth anchor:
D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_conjugacy - Truth anchor:
D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_fibre_clopen - Truth anchor:
D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedLiftSplitting.splitting_fibre_invariant - Dependency: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedCoboundary
- Dependency: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BalancedMinimal
- Dependency: D5/S1/Dynamics/Symbolic/PermutativeLifts/BipermutativeLift