Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Svinin’s Discrete-Polynomial Identity

Abstract

Svinin’s discrete-polynomial convolution identity holds over every commutative ring.

The field T(i) in Svinin’s paper is an arbitrary function u from the integers to a commutative ring R. Section 3 fixes (h,n)=(1,1). The finite maps lambda:Fin(r) to Fin(Int.toNat(s)) enumerate the increasing or weakly increasing tuples, with indices starting at zero. A product over Fin(0) is one. For positive degree a nonpositive subscript gives an empty sum. Natural subtraction in degree indices and finite-range lengths is truncated at zero; subscript and lattice arithmetic takes place in the integers. The displayed integer casts include the coercions from Fin through val.

Definition 1.1 (Strictly increasing tuple polynomials).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Algebraic/SvininDiscretePolynomialIdentity.T (✓ std3).

Citation. A. K. Svinin (2015). On integrals for some class of ordinary difference equations admitting a Lax pair representation. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/9/095201. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06394v2.

Commentary.

Page 3, Eq. (4): “T^r_s(i) := Σ_{{λ_j}∈D_{r,s}} T(i + λ_1h)T(i + λ_2h + n) ⋯ T(i + λ_rh + (r − 1)n) with D_{r,s} := {λ_j : 0 ≤ λ_1 < ⋯ < λ_r ≤ s − 1} … we put T^0_s(i) ≡ 1.” Here h=n=1, u is the paper’s field T, and a:Fin(r) is its factor index minus one.

Definition 1.2 (Weakly increasing tuple polynomials).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Algebraic/SvininDiscretePolynomialIdentity.S (✓ std3).

Citation. A. K. Svinin (2015). On integrals for some class of ordinary difference equations admitting a Lax pair representation. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/9/095201. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06394v2.

Commentary.

Page 5, Section 2.3: “S^r_s(i) := Σ_{{λ_j}∈B_{r,s}} T(i + λ_1h + (k − 1)n) ⋯ T(i + λ_{r−1}h + n)T(i + λ_rh) … B_{r,s} ≡ {λ_j : 0 ≤ λ_1 ≤ ⋯ ≤ λ_r ≤ s − 1}.” The printed k in the first offset is read as r, as determined by the displayed factor pattern and recurrences (10)–(11). With h=n=1 the offset at zero-based factor a is r−1−a in the integers.

Definition 1.3 (The alternating binary operation).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Algebraic/SvininDiscretePolynomialIdentity.bracket (✓ std3).

Citation. A. K. Svinin (2015). On integrals for some class of ordinary difference equations admitting a Lax pair representation. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/9/095201. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06394v2.

Commentary.

Page 12, Section 3.4: “⟨F, G⟩^r_s(i) = Σ_{j=0}^{r} (−1)^j F^{r−j}{s+j}(i) G^j{s−r+j}(i + r − j). Remark that in this formula we put F^r_s(i) ≡ 0 for s ≤ 0.” The sum uses Finset.range(r+1). For the polynomial families T and S, the zero-degree value stays one, including at nonpositive subscripts, while positive degrees vanish there.

Definition 1.4 (Conjecture 1, Eq. (48)).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Algebraic/SvininDiscretePolynomialIdentity.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. A. K. Svinin (2015). On integrals for some class of ordinary difference equations admitting a Lax pair representation. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/9/095201. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06394v2.

Commentary.

Page 12, Conjecture 1: “The relations ⟨S, T⟩^r_s(i) = Σ_{j=0}^{r−2} (−1)^j T(i + r − j − 2)T(i + s + j) × S^{r−j−2}{s+j+2}(i) T^j{s−r+j}(i + r − j), ∀ s ≥ r − 1 (48) are identities. Unfortunately, by now we can prove this conjecture only for r = 1, 2, 3.” The formula quantifies every commutative ring, every field u, every natural r≥1, and all integer s≥r−1 and i. For r=1 the right side is empty. Completeness of the literature search is ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED.

Theorem 1.5 (The identity in every degree).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Algebraic/SvininDiscretePolynomialIdentity.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/svinin-2015-discrete-polynomial-identity (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Algebraic/SvininDiscretePolynomialIdentity.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. A. K. Svinin (2015). On integrals for some class of ordinary difference equations admitting a Lax pair representation. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/9/095201. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06394v2.

Commentary.

The weighted tuple partitions give the left Pascal recurrences; reversal gives their right counterparts. Subtracting the quadratic correction from S produces a polynomial Q whose convolution with T is invariant under (s,i)↦(s−1,i+1). At s=r−1 all positive-degree T factors vanish. The remaining Q depends on a finite window and is invariant under translation for every field. A field cut off beyond that window agrees with zero on a disjoint translated window, so Q equals zero. Induction on s−r+1 and expansion of the correction prove the displayed identity. No division or nonzero field value is required; commutative rings with zero divisors are included. This proves the prerequisite used by the paper’s later difference-equation equivalences for (h,n)=(1,1); those equivalences and their other hypotheses are separate statements. General coprime (h,n) and noncommutative coefficients remain open here.

References