Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Scaled Quadratic Reversion Modulo Sixteen

Abstract

The normalized series of OEIS A396844 has alternating dyadic residues modulo sixteen.

The entry cited in hanna2026a396844 specifies A(xA(x)-4xA(x)^2)=x^2 with A(x)=x+…. Its conjecture says that above index eight the residue is twelve exactly at indices 24^k+1, and that every other coefficient is divisible by sixteen.

All indices and exponents are natural numbers, and all coefficients are integers. A denotes generatingSeries in PowerSeries(Z), and X is its indeterminate. The operator subst(F,U) substitutes U into F; coeff(n,F) extracts the nth coefficient; mk constructs a series from a coefficient function. The operator map uses the displayed ring homomorphism; IntCast(ZMod(m)) denotes Int.castRingHom into ZMod(m). Remainders are integer remainders. B, F, P, C and q in the construction below name its private unit part, factor, step, approximations and stabilized coefficient function, respectively.

Definition 1.1 (The integral construction).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.generatingSeries (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The normalized form is A=X+X^2*mk(q). If two inputs to P agree below degree d, their outputs agree below degree d+1: B gains one degree through multiplication by X, and the substituted term has an outer factor X. Thus coefficient n stabilizes after n+1 iterations. This gives an integral fixed point without division.

Definition 1.2 (The coefficient sequence).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.a (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The value a(n) is the integer coefficient of degree n in A.

Theorem 1.3 (The functional equation and normalization).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.generating_equation (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

For A=X+X^2c, the inner argument is X^2F(c). Expanding the composition gives X^2+X^3*(c-P(c)). The stabilized fixed point therefore satisfies the OEIS equation, with constant coefficient zero and linear coefficient one.

Theorem 1.4 (Uniqueness over the integers).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.generating_unique (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Every series with the two normalization conditions has a unique form X+X^2*c. Cancellation of X^3 turns its functional equation into c=P(c). Induction on the agreement degree proves that any two fixed points coincide.

Theorem 1.5 (Reduction modulo four).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.mod_four_identity (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Mapping the fixed-point equation to ZMod(4) makes c=0 a solution. The same degree-contraction uniqueness gives c=0 and hence A=X.

Theorem 1.6 (The corrected classification).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.mod_sixteen_classification (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Let R be inverseSeries from AlternatingDyadicReversionModFour. Its inverse_equation is R+R(X^2)=X. Write R=XT; then T+XT(X^2)=1. Over ZMod(16), multiplication by four annihilates each perturbation in B(4T) and F(4T). An annihilated difference of substitution arguments remains annihilated after taking powers and then after substitution. These facts show P(4T)=4T. Uniqueness gives A=X+4XR modulo sixteen. Coefficient induction in R+R(X^2)=X gives coefficient (-1)^k at degree 2^k and zero elsewhere, proving all three biconditionals.

Definition 1.7 (The literature conjecture as a closed proposition).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.hannaClaim (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

This proposition quantifies over every natural index greater than eight. It includes both the residue-twelve biconditional and the divisibility assertion at all remaining indices.

Theorem 1.8 (Refutation of the literature conjecture).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.hanna_conjecture_false (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a396844-scaled-quadratic-reversion-mod-sixteen (refuted) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.hanna_conjecture_false.

Citation. Paul D. Hanna (2026). OEIS A396844, g.f. satisfying A(xA(x) - 4xA(x)^2) = x^2*. URL: https://oeis.org/A396844.

Commentary.

The literature conjecture in hanna2026a396844 is refuted. The corrected classification holds for every n at least two: residue four occurs exactly at n=2^k+1 with even k, residue twelve exactly with odd k, and divisibility by sixteen exactly off this support. In particular, 17=2^4+1 has residue four by the symbolic classification. Since 17 is not 2*4^k+1 for any natural k, the conjecture would require sixteen to divide a(17), a contradiction.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.a
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.generatingSeries
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.generating_equation
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.generating_unique
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.hannaClaim
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.hanna_conjecture_false
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.mod_four_identity
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Parity/ScaledQuadraticReversionModSixteen.mod_sixteen_classification
  • Dependency: D5/S1/Recurrence/Invariants/AlternatingDyadicReversionModFour