Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

A126156 and the Totient Period Bound

Abstract

The square-root secant sequence has no eventual period dividing the totient at modulus four.

The source is OEIS A126156, revision 110, NAME and the third COMMENTS entry; the entry has no page numbers. The even coefficient at index n is scaled by (2n)!. A rational power series A represents the positive square root through constant coefficient one and A squared times cosSqrtTwo equal to one.

All sequence indices, moduli, onsets and periods are natural numbers. An integer z expresses divisibility in the rational coefficient field. Nat.div is natural-number division; the fraction in cosSqrtTwo is rational division. The type annotations in parentheses show the casts to the rationals.

Definition 1.1 (The rational cosine series).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Periodic/SquareRootSecantTotientPeriodRefutation.cosSqrtTwo (✓ std3).

Citation. Peter Bala (2026). OEIS A126156: eventual periods dividing the Euler totient. URL: https://oeis.org/A126156.

Commentary.

The coefficient at an even j is (-2) raised to j divided by two, divided by j factorial; the coefficient at an odd j is zero. This is cos(sqrt(2)*x) over the rationals.

Definition 1.2 (The square-root secant equation).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Periodic/SquareRootSecantTotientPeriodRefutation.IsSourceEGF (✓ std3).

Citation. Peter Bala (2026). OEIS A126156: eventual periods dividing the Euler totient. URL: https://oeis.org/A126156.

Commentary.

Expansion of e.g.f. sqrt(sec(sqrt(2)*x)), showing coefficients of only the even powers of x. (OEIS A126156, revision 110, NAME; no page number.) The series has constant coefficient one and its square multiplied by cosSqrtTwo is one. These equations select the formal square root with positive constant term.

Definition 1.3 (Bala’s eventual period assertion).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Periodic/SquareRootSecantTotientPeriodRefutation.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. Peter Bala (2026). OEIS A126156: eventual periods dividing the Euler totient. URL: https://oeis.org/A126156.

Commentary.

Conjecture: the sequence {a(n)} reduced modulo a positive integer k is eventually periodic with the period dividing phi(k), where phi(n) = A000010(n). An example is given below. - Peter Bala, Mar 01 2026 (OEIS A126156, revision 110, third COMMENTS entry; no page number.) The expression (2n)! times PowerSeries.coeff(2n,A) is the zero-based sequence a(n). The assertion includes existence of such an A and quantifies over every such A, every positive modulus k, an eventual onset N and a positive period p dividing Nat.totient(k).

Theorem 1.4 (The totient period assertion is false).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Periodic/SquareRootSecantTotientPeriodRefutation.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/bala126156 (refuted) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Periodic/SquareRootSecantTotientPeriodRefutation.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. Peter Bala (2026). OEIS A126156: eventual periods dividing the Euler totient. URL: https://oeis.org/A126156.

Commentary.

For each series satisfying the square-root secant equation, the scaled even coefficients are integers and odd, and their two-step differences equal four times an integer plus two. Integer derivative polynomials give the two-step identity, and induction gives oddness. At modulus four the totient is two; the permitted positive periods are one and two. Period one would imply period two by adding consecutive differences. The two-step identity excludes either period at every onset. This does not settle a bound of twice the totient or a general assertion for odd moduli.

References