Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Dyadic Denominators of OEIS A381670

Abstract

Every reduced denominator of the normalized compositional-square series is a power of two.

Thomas Scheuerle’s entry of March 3, 2025, cited in scheuerle2025a381670, defines A by x(A(x)+1)=A(A(x)), with constant coefficient zero and linear coefficient one. A381669 records the reduced numerators; A381670 records the positive reduced denominators.

A denotes generatingSeries, f(n) its rational coefficient, and X the formal variable. The notation coeff(n,P) means the coefficient of X^n in P, C embeds a scalar as a constant series, subst(P,Q) means P(Q(X)), and rescale(c,P) means P(cX). The integral series I is built from compatible approximations P_n. The map iota sends integers to rationals. All indices are natural numbers; subtraction in an exponent is natural subtraction. The operation div below is integer division.

Definition 1.1 (Construction by compatible integral approximations).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.generatingSeries (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Set E(P)=P(P(X))-X-4XP. Starting with P_0=X, correct degree n+2 by subtracting half its residual. The triangular composition identity gives multiplier two in that degree and preserves every lower degree. If P-X=2Q, then Q(P)-Q(X) is divisible by two, because P^j-X^j is divisible by P-X. Therefore E(P) is divisible by four and each correction is even. The stable coefficients define I. Scaling back gives A=4I(X/4), with the integer coefficients embedded in the rationals.

Definition 1.2 (The rational coefficient sequence).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.f (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The sequence f is extracted from the constructed formal series. Its reduced denominators are the terms of A381670, with denominator one for any zero coefficient.

Theorem 1.3 (The defining functional equation).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.functional_equation (✓ std3). ∎

Citation. Thomas Scheuerle (2025). OEIS A381670, denominators of the compositional-square series. URL: https://oeis.org/A381670.

Commentary.

The limit of the corrected approximations satisfies I(I(X))=X+4XI(X). Mapping to rational coefficients and conjugating by the linear scaling gives exactly X(A+1)=A(A(X)), with the stated constant and linear terms.

Theorem 1.4 (Uniqueness with the specified normalization).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.uniqueness (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

If two normalized series agree below degree n, their compositional squares differ there by twice their coefficient difference. The right side X+XB depends only on the preceding coefficient. Induction therefore forces equality at every degree over the rationals.

Theorem 1.5 (The rescaled coefficients are even integers).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.rescaled_even (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Every integral approximation differs from X by twice an integer series. This persists in the compatible limit I. Undoing the scaling identifies its degree-n coefficient with 4^(n-1)f(n) for n at least two.

Theorem 1.6 (Every denominator is a power of two).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.scheuerle_conjecture (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a381670-compositional-square-dyadic-denominators (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.scheuerle_conjecture.

Citation. Thomas Scheuerle (2025). OEIS A381670, denominators of the compositional-square series. URL: https://oeis.org/A381670.

Commentary.

For n at least two the even-integer invariant writes f(n) as an integer divided by 4^(n-1). Its reduced denominator divides that power of two, so it is itself a power of two. At indices zero and one the coefficients are zero and one, both with denominator one. No nonzero-coefficient restriction is imposed.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.f
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.functional_equation
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.generatingSeries
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.rescaled_even
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.scheuerle_conjecture
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/CompositionalSquareDyadicDenominators.uniqueness