Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Index Divisibility for Vanishing Diagonals

Abstract

Normalized vanishing diagonals inherit index-power divisibility from their exponents.

The note hanna2016diagonalindex quotes Hanna’s A266489, A300732, A300733, A292394, and A300734. The normalized family has constant and linear coefficients one and vanishing diagonals in degrees n>1. The NAMEs of A300732 and A300733 print n>=1, which contradicts their published linear coefficient one. Their instances below use the consistent n>1 interpretation; the literal quotations remain in the note.

The function e maps natural numbers to natural numbers. Indices n, m, j, depths d, and the divisibility exponent k are natural. Write A(e) for generatingSeries(e), P(e,d) for the integer-series approximation, and frozen(p,n) for NegativePowerDiagonalModPrime.a(p,n). All series have integer coefficients. The operator intCast embeds a natural number in the integers. Divisibility in the exponent hypothesis is natural divisibility; divisibility of coefficients is integer divisibility.

The operators coeff, mk, subst, and invOfUnit are the Lean power-series operations. For a normalized series, invOfUnit(A,1) is its formal inverse, so subst(A,X*invOfUnit(A,1)^e(n)) means A(x/A(x)^e(n)). In the engine identity U is a unit, val forgets its unit structure, and N is an arbitrary integer, including negative values. Subtraction in a coefficient index is natural subtraction; subtraction from N is integer subtraction.

Definition 1.1 (The triangular coefficient construction).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.a (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The update fixes degrees zero and one at one. At every higher degree it negates the sum over smaller outer degrees. The degree-zero summand vanishes, and every positive outer degree leaves a strictly smaller degree in the inverse power. Each update therefore improves agreement by one degree, making the indicated coefficients stable.

Definition 1.2 (The generating series).

Formalization. D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.generatingSeries (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The stabilized integer coefficients define A(e).

Theorem 1.3 (The normalized vanishing-diagonal equation).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.generating_equation (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Expanding the substitution through outer degree n gives a(e,n) plus the finite sum used in the update. The fixed-point identity thus proves the displayed functional equation, with both normalization conditions.

Theorem 1.4 (Uniqueness).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.generating_unique (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The normalized equation is equivalent to the triangular fixed-point condition. The inverse-difference identity preserves coefficient agreement, and the update increases its degree. Induction identifies every normalized solution B with A(e).

Theorem 1.5 (The integer-power engine).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.power_coefficient_identity (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Apply the formal derivative to integer powers of a unit. Multiplying by U handles the successor step; cancellation by the same unit handles the predecessor step. Extracting degree j-1 gives the identity for every integer N. In particular, N divides j times the coefficient.

Theorem 1.6 (The general index-power theorem).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.index_power_divisibility (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Strong induction reduces the result to each smaller-degree summand. For each prime p, put alpha=v_p(n). If v_p(m)<alpha, then v_p(n-m)=v_p(m). The engine applied to the inverse series with exponent e(n)m forces its coefficient to contain p^(kalpha). If v_p(m)>=alpha, the induction hypothesis supplies that factor in a(e,m). Prime factorization assembles these factors into n^k, and divisibility survives the finite sum and its negation.

Theorem 1.7 (A300732: index divisibility).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300732 (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a300732-diagonal-index-divisibility (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300732.

Citation. Paul D. Hanna (2016). OEIS A266489, A300732, A300733, A292394, and A300734: vanishing-diagonal index divisibility. URL: https://oeis.org/A266489.

Commentary.

Use e(m)=2*m and k=1 in the normalized family. The interpretation of the source’s degree-one boundary is stated above.

Theorem 1.8 (A300733: index divisibility).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300733 (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a300733-diagonal-index-divisibility (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300733.

Citation. Paul D. Hanna (2016). OEIS A266489, A300732, A300733, A292394, and A300734: vanishing-diagonal index divisibility. URL: https://oeis.org/A266489.

Commentary.

Use e(m)=3*m and k=1 in the normalized family. The interpretation of the source’s degree-one boundary is stated above.

Theorem 1.9 (A292394: square-index divisibility).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a292394 (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a292394-diagonal-index-divisibility (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a292394.

Citation. Paul D. Hanna (2016). OEIS A266489, A300732, A300733, A292394, and A300734: vanishing-diagonal index divisibility. URL: https://oeis.org/A266489.

Commentary.

Use e(m)=m^2 and k=2. The exponent-divisibility hypothesis is reflexive.

Theorem 1.10 (A300734: square-index divisibility).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300734 (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a300734-diagonal-index-divisibility (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300734.

Citation. Paul D. Hanna (2016). OEIS A266489, A300732, A300733, A292394, and A300734: vanishing-diagonal index divisibility. URL: https://oeis.org/A266489.

Commentary.

Use e(m)=2*m^2 and k=2. Every square m^2 divides this exponent.

Theorem 1.11 (Agreement with the frozen A266489 object).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.agreement_a266489 (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

For p=2 and n>1, the frozen exponent (p-1)*(n-1)+1 equals n. NegativePowerDiagonalModPrime.generating_unique identifies the two normalized series. Coefficient extraction gives agreement at every degree.

Theorem 1.12 (A266489: clause C1 on the frozen object).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a266489 (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a266489-diagonal-index-divisibility (proved) by D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a266489.

Citation. Paul D. Hanna (2016). OEIS A266489, A300732, A300733, A292394, and A300734: vanishing-diagonal index divisibility. URL: https://oeis.org/A266489.

Commentary.

The general theorem with e(m)=m and k=1 gives index divisibility. The agreement lemma transfers it to the frozen coefficient function, proving clause C1 on that existing object.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.a
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.agreement_a266489
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.generatingSeries
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.generating_equation
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.generating_unique
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a266489
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a292394
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300732
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300733
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.hanna_conjecture_a300734
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.index_power_divisibility
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/DiagonalVanishingIndexDivisibility.power_coefficient_identity
  • Dependency: D5/S1/Recurrence/Residue/NegativePowerDiagonalModPrime