Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Alternating Words and Residual Intervals

Abstract

Blocked alternating words correspond to interlaced residual pairs.

Let a and b permute 1 through m, and write A and B for their prefix sums, starting at zero. The Lean permutations use Fin m, with one added to each value. The results include m=0. This chapter treats explicitly alternating words; the passage from all Wronskian contribution permutations to these words remains to be proved.

Definition 1.1 (Nonnegative heights).

Formalization. D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.Good (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Good requires every height, including the initial and final heights, to be nonnegative.

Definition 1.2 (Blocked disjoint pairs).

Formalization. D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.Unswappable (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

A complete pair is blocked when its two orders cannot both start legally at the current height. Continue after the pair; an empty list or a singleton has no complete pair and satisfies this condition.

Definition 1.3 (Expanding pairs).

Formalization. D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.alternating (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The entries of each pair are natural numbers. Expand a pair to its first entry and the negation of its second entry, both as integers. The empty list expands to the singleton zero.

Definition 1.4 (Encoding two permutations).

Formalization. D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encode (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Read the displayed a and b entries in one-based notation. This is the explicit alternating word ending in zero.

Theorem 1.5 (The interval characterization).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encode_rule_iff (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Before block i the height is A at i-1 minus B at i-1. The reversed order is illegal exactly when A at i-1 is less than B at i; the block endpoint is nonnegative exactly when B at i is at most A at i. Induction over the blocks proves both implications, including the initial and final heights.

Theorem 1.6 (Recovering the two permutations).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encode_injective (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Equality at alternating positions recovers the entries of a and b separately. Equality of the finite lists therefore gives equality of both permutations.

Theorem 1.7 (Summing the product signs).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encoded_product_sign_sum (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The sums range over permutations of Fin m. Apply the interval characterization, factor out sign(a), and use the residual identity. Only a equal to the identity contributes. This formula uses the product of the two signs; identifying it with the sign of an ambient contribution permutation is a separate remaining step.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.Good
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.Unswappable
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.alternating
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encode
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encode_injective
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encode_rule_iff
  • Truth anchor: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/AlternatingResidualBridge.encoded_product_sign_sum
  • Dependency: D5/S1/Words/Compositions/ResidualPermutationSign