Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Weighted Residue-Prefix Rectangle Moments

Abstract

Actual residue-prefix caps transfer weighted second moments of arbitrary finite layers.

Theorem 1.1 (An explicit bound for the actual joint rectangle load).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/PrimeRectangleTransfer.prefix_weighted_rectangle_second_moment_le

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/PrimeRectangleTransfer.prefix_weighted_rectangle_second_moment_le (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Let X and I be finite types and p and H natural numbers. The old weights mu(x) and all layer coefficients A(e,i,x) are nonnegative. At each old point x, K(x,y) is a nonnegative probability distribution on Fin(p^H). For every depth t from one through H, every residue r and every x, assume the K-mass of y mod p^t = r mod p^t is at most M(t,x). This envelope may depend on both t and x.

Assume the zero layer’s mu-weighted second moment is at most G0. For every positive depth t and each exponent e at most t, assume the second moment of the layer sum over I, weighted by mu(x)M(t,x), is at most G(t,e). Thus each old layer has its own bound at each prefix depth. Choose arbitrary natural residues b(e,i). The new load sums A(e,i,x) over those pairs whose residue condition y mod p^e = b(e,i) mod p^e holds. Its squared expectation under mu(x)K(x,y) is at most G0 plus the sum, for t from one through H, of the sum of G(t,e) over e from zero through t, plus t times G(t,t).

The proof bounds each actual intersection by its deeper cylinder, derives nonnegativity of the prefix envelope from the kernel, and controls cross-layer moments by weighted Young’s inequality. Kernel normalization handles the zero-exponent pair without distortion. For each pair with maximum t, the two layer-specific moment bounds enter with weight one half. An induction sums these weights, retaining the contribution of the same zero layer in all its cross terms.

If all old layers at depth t use the same bound Gt, the result specializes to G0 plus the sum of (2t+1)Gt. If the zero layer instead has bound Dt, while every positive old layer has bound Gt, the contribution is Dt+2tGt. This retains information about the particular old layout shared by the zero-to-positive crosses; no separate wrapper theorem is needed.

The statement includes H = 0. It needs neither primality of p, normalization of mu, independence from x, nor compatible choices of the test residues. This is the rectangle estimate used in joint-load arguments for distinct covering systems. Constructing the probability kernel and embedding a divisor layout by the Chinese remainder theorem are separate proof obligations; this theorem does not settle the odd covering problem.

References