Two-Odd-Prime Uncovered Density
Abstract
Congruence classes with distinct nontrivial moduli supported on two odd primes leave a positive density of residue classes uncovered.
Theorem 1.1 (At least one eighth of the residues remain uncovered).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/TwoOddPrimeUncoveredDensity.two_odd_prime_uncovered_density (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Let p and q be distinct odd primes and let L = p^A q^B, with A and B arbitrary natural numbers, including zero. A finite set D records distinct moduli. If every d in D is greater than one and divides L, then every assignment a of residue representatives leaves at least one eighth of Fin L uncovered.
Here mod denotes natural-number remainder, val is the coercion from Fin L to its natural representative, and card counts the displayed finite set. The proof counts one residue fibre exactly as L/d, bounds the finite union of covered fibres, identifies the ambient reciprocal sum with the divisor sum with d = 1 removed, and proves 8 sigma(L) <= 15L from two finite geometric estimates.
The reciprocal-sum necessary condition is classical covering-system folklore: the reciprocal sum of covering moduli is at least one. The quantified two-odd-prime form proved here is repository-derived. Hough and Nielsen (2019), Covering systems with restricted divisibility, and Balister, Bollobas, Morris, Sahasrabudhe and Tiba (2022), On the Erdos Covering Problem: the density of the uncovered set, provide background on odd covering systems; neither is cited as attesting the displayed two-prime L/8 bound.
This is a periphery result for Erdos problem 7. It excludes modulus families supported on at most two odd primes; it does not resolve the open problem for arbitrary distinct odd moduli.
Proposition 1.2 (The residue classes cannot cover the complete period).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/TwoOddPrimeUncoveredDensity.two_odd_prime_residue_classes_do_not_cover (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Under the same prime, exponent, modulus, and residue hypotheses, it is not the case that every element of Fin(p^A q^B) belongs to one of the selected congruence classes. This is the named bind-only companion directed from the no-cover consequence to the preceding density theorem. This consequence is repository-derived from that theorem; the literature above supplies background only.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/TwoOddPrimeUncoveredDensity.two_odd_prime_residue_classes_do_not_cover - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/TwoOddPrimeUncoveredDensity.two_odd_prime_uncovered_density