Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

The OEIS A343502 Divisor-Count Prime Conjecture

Abstract

Dequatre’s OEIS A343502 conjecture: every member except 2 and 3 is composite.

Definition 1.1 (The defining membership condition for A343502).

Formalization. D5/S3/Arith/Divisors/OeisA343502DivisorCountPrimes.InA343502 (✓ std3).

Citation. C. H. R. Dequatre (2021). OEIS A343502, Numbers k such that tau(tau(k)) and tau(k+1) are both prime. URL: https://oeis.org/A343502.

Commentary.

The OEIS entry defines the sequence as numbers k such that tau(tau(k)) and tau(k+1) are both prime, where tau is the number of divisors function. The displayed expression expands tau literally as the cardinality of Nat.divisors and includes the positive-integer condition 1 ≤ k.

Definition 1.2 (Dequatre’s conjecture).

Formalization. D5/S3/Arith/Divisors/OeisA343502DivisorCountPrimes.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. C. H. R. Dequatre (2021). OEIS A343502, Numbers k such that tau(tau(k)) and tau(k+1) are both prime. URL: https://oeis.org/A343502.

Commentary.

The OEIS comment states verbatim: “Conjecture: all members except 2 and 3 are composite.” Here composite is encoded by 1 < k and the negation of Nat.Prime k, while membership retains the positive-index and two-prime conditions above.

Theorem 1.3 (The conjecture holds).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Arith/Divisors/OeisA343502DivisorCountPrimes.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/oeis-a343502-divisor-count-primes-dequatre (proved) by D5/S3/Arith/Divisors/OeisA343502DivisorCountPrimes.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. C. H. R. Dequatre (2021). OEIS A343502, Numbers k such that tau(tau(k)) and tau(k+1) are both prime. URL: https://oeis.org/A343502.

Commentary.

Assume k is a member other than 2 or 3. If k were prime, it would be odd, so k + 1 would be even. The prime divisor count of k + 1 forces every prime factor of k + 1 to be 2; hence k + 1 is a power of 2. The exponent is prime, and the primality of the divisor count makes the exponent equal to 2, forcing k = 3, a contradiction.

The proof therefore establishes 1 < k and not Nat.Prime k for every remaining member. The separate OEIS question about whether A343502 has finitely many odd terms is not asserted here.

References