Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Corrected simultaneous window closure

Abstract

Corrected simultaneous window closure

Theorem 1.1 (small proper predecessor).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Circle/FourNegative/SecondPeakA2AllH/SmallWindows.small_proper_predecessor

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Combinatorics/Circle/FourNegative/SecondPeakA2AllH/SmallWindows.small_proper_predecessor (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

A consumed part of corrected simultaneous window closure. The complete module scope and assumptions are stated below.

Theorem 1.2 (finish small bounds).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Circle/FourNegative/SecondPeakA2AllH/SmallWindows.finish_small_bounds

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Combinatorics/Circle/FourNegative/SecondPeakA2AllH/SmallWindows.finish_small_bounds (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

A consumed part of corrected simultaneous window closure. The complete module scope and assumptions are stated below.

For x=4 define Delta=5M-(y-8hp). The sufficient interval is 4h<=Delta<=4hp, with p>=4, q>=2 and h>=4. Together with the four first-window slacks and 1<=v, 2v<=t, finish_small_bounds proves all three old and enlarged window bounds and both M stocks. The lower bound is 4h; no arbitrary-h bound 2h is asserted.

The common second endpoint is governed by r=B-K+ML. Exact polynomial identities show r>=0 and B-1-2r-(y-M)(z+1)>=0. The enlarged second endpoint is 4r+2(y-M)(z+1). The third caps factor through z-8>=0. The integer stock follows from 2M<y and even y. Proper submasks use the predecessor low block with multiplier at least two.

References