Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Lattice saturation and the physical suffix charge

Abstract

Lattice saturation and the physical suffix charge

Theorem 1.1 (One occurrence, one return, one suffix budget).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Circle/Lattice/LatticeChargePrecedence.lattice_saturation_suffix_precedence

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Combinatorics/Circle/Lattice/LatticeChargePrecedence.lattice_saturation_suffix_precedence (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Let G>0 and H>0. Supply a permutation of all m physical labels, old values f in G times the integers, nonnegative charges q of positive total A, and new old-label values g=2f-q. The fresh label m has value A and is literally inserted at cut j. Retain both complete zero totals, every old prefix in [0,C], and every new prefix in [0,N]. Let nu have old value -H, positive charge, H in the same lattice, and H<=C<H+G.

Write p=idxOf(nu), with zero-based positions. The old height immediately before nu is a lattice point in [H,C], so it is exactly H; immediately after nu it is zero. If the ear had not occurred, the new prefix ending at nu would be minus the already used charge, which is strictly negative. Thus j<=p, including insertion immediately before nu.

The actual new prefix immediately before nu now has height 2H+A-Q_p. Its upper bound gives A-Q_p<=N-2H. The permutation and complete charge total identify A-Q_p with the charge sum of sigma.drop p, the suffix containing nu itself. Every distinct label delta with q_delta+q_nu>N-2H must precede nu. Nonnegative charges put both charges into this very same suffix if delta has not yet occurred. No favorable alternative cut, pre-placed delta, or numerical-value quotient is assumed.

Strict saturation C<H+G and strict charge dominance are retained. The complete zero totals preserve the joint physical witness interpretation although the local order argument does not need them. This is a necessary-order theorem; it constructs no joint witness and leaves physical J and Circle C3.1 open. The proof reuses the original ear_prefix and sum_linear owners. No independent literature novelty is asserted.

References