Explicit Exceptional Orbits
Abstract
Three explicit orbit words leave the avoidance layers at successive depths.
Theorem 1.1 (The exceptional orbit chain).
Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/FundamentalBijection/ThetaIterateExceptional.cyclic_last_endpoint
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Combinatorics/FundamentalBijection/ThetaIterateExceptional.cyclic_last_endpoint (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. Kassie Archer, Robert P. Laudone (2024). Pattern avoidance and the fundamental bijection. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.06338. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06338v1.
Commentary.
For size n at least three, let C be two through n followed by one and D be n followed by two through n minus one and then one. The fundamental images of C and D are respectively n followed by one through n minus one and C; D avoids 132 through depth two, and P of C followed by n plus one does so as well. For n at least four, let E be P of the increasing word of size n minus two. Its image is D; E lies at depth five but not six, D at depth four but not five, and C at depth three but not four.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Combinatorics/FundamentalBijection/ThetaIterateExceptional.cyclic_last_endpoint - Dependency: D5/S3/Combinatorics/FundamentalBijection/ThetaIterateCycleReduction
- Dependency: D5/S3/Combinatorics/FundamentalBijection/ThetaIterateTail
- Dependency: D5/S3/Combinatorics/FundamentalBijection/ThetaIterateVFamilies