Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

The exact five-dimensional bad science optimum

Abstract

The displayed five-dimensional bad science matrix maximizes the unit-row functional.

Definition 1.1 (The bad science functional).

Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hamming/BadScienceFiveOptimality.beta (✓ std3).

Citation. Alex Albors, Hisham Bhatti, Lukshya Ganjoo, Raymond Guo, Dmitriy Kunisky, Rohan Mukherjee, Alicia Stepin, Tony Zeng (2026). On the Structure of Bad Science Matrices. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2026.19.443. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00933.

Commentary.

Section 1 (arXiv v2, p. 1) says: “The bad science matrix problem [4] is concerned with understanding, for matrices A ∈ ℝⁿˣⁿ whose rows are normalized to have ℓ²-length 1, the size of the quantity” and displays β(A) = 2⁻ⁿ ∑ ‖Ax‖∞ over x ∈ {−1,1}ⁿ. Here Fin n indexes coordinates, Bool indexes each sign, true gives +1, and false gives −1. The norm on Fin n → ℝ is the sup norm.

Definition 1.2 (Unit Euclidean rows).

Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hamming/BadScienceFiveOptimality.UnitRows (✓ std3).

Citation. Alex Albors, Hisham Bhatti, Lukshya Ganjoo, Raymond Guo, Dmitriy Kunisky, Rohan Mukherjee, Alicia Stepin, Tony Zeng (2026). On the Structure of Bad Science Matrices. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2026.19.443. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00933.

Commentary.

Section 1 (arXiv v2, p. 1) requires rows “normalized to have ℓ²-length 1”. For each row the sum of the squares of its real entries is one.

Definition 1.3 (The five-dimensional matrix).

Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hamming/BadScienceFiveOptimality.Astar (✓ std3).

Citation. Alex Albors, Hisham Bhatti, Lukshya Ganjoo, Raymond Guo, Dmitriy Kunisky, Rohan Mukherjee, Alicia Stepin, Tony Zeng (2026). On the Structure of Bad Science Matrices. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2026.19.443. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00933.

Commentary.

Section 1.4 (arXiv v2, p. 3) displays this matrix, including its scalar factor 1/(2√3). The indices 0 through 4 list its rows and columns in order.

Definition 1.4 (The optimality question).

Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hamming/BadScienceFiveOptimality.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. Alex Albors, Hisham Bhatti, Lukshya Ganjoo, Raymond Guo, Dmitriy Kunisky, Rohan Mukherjee, Alicia Stepin, Tony Zeng (2026). On the Structure of Bad Science Matrices. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2026.19.443. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00933.

Commentary.

Section 1.4 (arXiv v2, p. 3) asks verbatim: “We do not know whether this matrix is indeed optimal.” Optimality means that every real five-by-five matrix with unit Euclidean rows has beta at most beta Astar. All 32 Boolean functions are counted once, with uniform weight 1/32.

Theorem 1.5 (Optimality in dimension five).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hamming/BadScienceFiveOptimality.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/albors-et-al-2024-bad-science-matrix-five (proved) by D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hamming/BadScienceFiveOptimality.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. Alex Albors, Hisham Bhatti, Lukshya Ganjoo, Raymond Guo, Dmitriy Kunisky, Rohan Mukherjee, Alicia Stepin, Tony Zeng (2026). On the Structure of Bad Science Matrices. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2026.19.443. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00933.

Commentary.

The maximum is (2 + 3√3)/4. For every antipodal-free subset S of the five-cube, with m vertices and vector sum u, the proof bounds the Euclidean length of u by (2√3 − 2)m + 8 − 4√3. The parity bound handles m at most five, while cube orthogonality and Cauchy–Schwarz handle m at least six. Choose one maximizing row for each vertex with coordinate zero positive, and orient its sign so its row product is nonnegative. The resulting five cells are antipodal-free and their sizes sum to 16. Summing the affine bound gives 8 + 12√3. For Astar, eight vertices have image sup norm 2 and the other 24 have image sup norm √3, attaining the bound. Uniqueness and dimensions at least six remain open.

References