Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Nikandish’s subspace orthogonality clique number

Abstract

The exact clique number for all nonzero binary subspaces in every positive dimension.

Definition 1.1 (The source graph).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.orthogonalityGraph

Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.orthogonalityGraph (✓ std3).

Citation. R. Nikandish (2026). Annihilating-Ideal Graphs and Orthogonality Graphs over F_2. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2609.22769. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22769v1.

Commentary.

Vertices are all nonzero subspaces of F_2^n. Distinct U and W are adjacent exactly when sum_i u_i w_i is zero for every u in U and w in W. There is no dimension, nondegeneracy, or intersection restriction.

Definition 1.2 (An independent lattice count).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.nonzeroSubspaceCount

Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.nonzeroSubspaceCount (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. R. Nikandish (2026). Annihilating-Ideal Graphs and Orthogonality Graphs over F_2. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2609.22769. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22769v1.

Commentary.

N(r) is the natural cardinality of the complete nonzero submodule lattice of Fin r -> ZMod 2. In particular N(0)=0. No Gaussian-binomial bridge is asserted by this definition or by the result.

Theorem 1.3 (The exact formula in every dimension).

Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.result

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/nikandish-subspace-orthogonality-clique (proved) by D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. R. Nikandish (2026). Annihilating-Ideal Graphs and Orthogonality Graphs over F_2. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2609.22769. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22769v1.

Commentary.

For every natural n with 1 <= n, omega(O_n*) equals max(n, N(n/2) + n%2), using natural-number division and remainder. This is the literal all-subspace question in source Problem 4.2.

For an arbitrary clique, sum the radicals of its members to obtain R. Every member U lies in R-perp and U intersect R equals rad(U). The restricted form descends to R-perp/R. Its nonzero member images have nondegenerate restrictions and are indexed independent, so their number is at most n-2 dim(R). The other members inject into the nonzero submodule lattice of R. No nonalternating hypothesis is imposed on the quotient.

For r >= 1, a hyperplane embedding, one outside line, and the whole space give N(r+1) >= N(r)+2. This moves the upper bound to an endpoint. Coordinate lines attain n. Duplicating t coordinates gives a totally isotropic t-space whose full nonzero lattice attains N(t); in odd dimension its perpendicular space is a distinct extra vertex.

The source already provides the odd construction at n=7. Its Lemma 3.2 incorrectly counts three nonzero subspaces of F_2^2; there are four. The present upper bound does not use that argument. Prior-resolution searches are bounded and do not certify worldwide novelty.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.nonzeroSubspaceCount
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.orthogonalityGraph
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Combinatorics/Orthogonality/NikandishClique.result
  • Dependency: D5/S3/Fourier/CharacterSelection/BinaryCharacterCodeDuality