Partial Theta Coefficients and Hankel Determinants
Abstract
Backward shifts of partial theta coefficients define Hankel determinants and their normalized polynomial quotients.
Definition 1.1 (The partial theta coefficient).
Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.coeffA
Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.coeffA (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. Johann Cigler (2024). Hankel determinants of backward shifts of the coefficients of a partial theta function. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.05768. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05768v2.
Commentary.
For every integer s, a(s, q) is q^{binom(s, 2)} when s is nonnegative and zero when s is negative. It is a polynomial in q with integer coefficients. These are the coefficients of the partial theta series summed over nonnegative s of q^{binom(s, 2)} x^s, extended by zero to negative indices.
Definition 1.2 (The backward-shifted Hankel determinant).
Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.hankel
Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.hankel (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. Johann Cigler (2024). Hankel determinants of backward shifts of the coefficients of a partial theta function. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.05768. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05768v2.
Commentary.
For nonnegative integers m and N, D_{-m,N}(q) is the determinant of the N by N matrix with entry a(-m + i + j, q) in row i and column j, where i and j range from zero through N - 1. The determinant is a polynomial in q with integer coefficients; the determinant of the empty matrix is one.
Definition 1.3 (The normalized quotient conjecture).
Lean statement: D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.claim
Formalization. D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.claim (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. Johann Cigler (2024). Hankel determinants of backward shifts of the coefficients of a partial theta function. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.05768. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05768v2.
Commentary.
For every pair of nonnegative integers m and n, D_{0,n+1}(q) is nonzero and there exists a polynomial r_{m,n}(q) with integer coefficients such that D_{-m,n+m+1}(q) = (-1)^{binom(m + 1, 2)} r_{m,n}(q) q^{m binom(n, 2)} D_{0,n+1}(q). This polynomial is monic, has degree mn(n + m + 2)/2, and satisfies r_{m,n}(1) = 1 and r_{m,n}(0) = (-1)^{mn}. This is the conjecture following equation (2) in Section 1 of Cigler’s paper, together with nonvanishing of the unshifted determinant.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.claim - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.coeffA - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Combinatorics/PartialTheta/PartialThetaHankelDefs.hankel