Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Refinement-Monotone Answer Domain

Abstract

Canonical safe answers and their admitted answer domain grow monotonically under concept refinement.

Theorem 1.1 (Refinement preserves the canonical answer value).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Answering/RefinementMonotoneAnswerDomain.refinement_monotone_answer_domain (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Suppose a coarse concept canonically answers y at an admitted state x. A refinement splits coarse fibers without merging distinct ones, so every state in the refined fiber of x still has target y.

The coarse canonical answer supplies a zero-error answerer on refined fibers by composition with the factor map. Since x inhabits the relevant refined fiber, safe-answer coverage maximality forces the refined canonical answer to return the same value y.

Lemma 1.2 (The admitted answer domain is monotone under refinement).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Answering/RefinementMonotoneAnswerDomain.answer_domain_monotone (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The answer domain contains exactly the admitted states where the canonical safe answerer returns some target value. Extracting that value and applying answer preservation shows that every state answered by a coarse concept is also answered by any refinement.

The Boolean smoke instance shows that the containment can be strict: a constant concept cannot safely distinguish false from true, while the identity refinement answers both admitted states.

References