Truthfulness and Sufficiency
Abstract
Truthful reporting and target sufficiency jointly yield a sufficient sent report, while neither condition implies the other.
Theorem 1.1 (Reporting honesty and sufficiency are independent factors).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Communication/TruthfulnessSufficiencyIndependence.truthfulness_sufficiency_independence (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
A report profile publicly contains a target on states, the report that the state warrants, the report actually sent, and a decoder from messages to target values.
Equality of the sent and truthful mechanisms transports a factorization through the truthful mechanism to the sent mechanism. This is the forward trust clause.
Four concrete finite profiles establish the two independent axes. A Unit message space is honest but too coarse; a Boolean identity report with a negated sent message is sufficient but dishonest; identity mechanisms satisfy both; and distinct constant reports with a varying target satisfy neither.
Repository and pinned-library searches found no exact report-factorization theorem. Loogle missed, and LeanSearch returned only probabilistic notions of independence.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Communication/TruthfulnessSufficiencyIndependence.truthfulness_sufficiency_independence