Reachability Projection Invariance
Abstract
Prerequisite and consequence closures depend only on reachability, not the chosen direct-edge presentation.
Theorem 1.1 (Reachability-equivalent graphs have equal prerequisite closures).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DagCompletion/ReachabilityProjectionInvariance.prerequisiteClosure_eq (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
If two direct-edge relations induce the same reflexive-transitive reachability relation, they generate identical prerequisite closures of every displayed target set.
The SameReachability hypothesis is explicit; equality of direct edge relations is neither assumed nor concluded.
Theorem 1.2 (Reachability-equivalent graphs have equal consequence closures).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DagCompletion/ReachabilityProjectionInvariance.consequenceClosure_eq (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For the same pair of reachability-equivalent presentations, consequence closures of a displayed source set are equal.
The theorem changes only the edge presentation and holds the source set fixed on both sides.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DagCompletion/ReachabilityProjectionInvariance.consequenceClosure_eq - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DagCompletion/ReachabilityProjectionInvariance.prerequisiteClosure_eq - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DagCompletion/ConsequenceClosure
- Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DependencyTopology/DependencyReachabilityOrder