Public Goods Dominance-Welfare Contrast
Abstract
Private noncontribution dominance contrasts with maximal unanimous-contribution welfare.
Theorem 1.1 (Private incentives and social welfare point in opposite directions).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DecisionValueScale/PublicGoodsDominanceWelfareContrast.public_goods_dominance_welfare_contrast (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The imported contribution level, aggregate, and zero-compensation utility construct the source payoff. Changing one agent’s action to contribution changes that payoff by b/n-c, independently of the other actions.
Summing the same individual utilities counts every contribution benefit n times and its private cost once. The resulting welfare coefficient b-c is positive, so unanimous contribution is socially maximal even though noncontribution is privately strictly dominant.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DecisionValueScale/PublicGoodsDominanceWelfareContrast.public_goods_dominance_welfare_contrast - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DecisionValue/ContributionIncentiveThreshold