Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Public Goods Dominance-Welfare Contrast

Abstract

Private noncontribution dominance contrasts with maximal unanimous-contribution welfare.

Theorem 1.1 (Private incentives and social welfare point in opposite directions).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DecisionValueScale/PublicGoodsDominanceWelfareContrast.public_goods_dominance_welfare_contrast (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The imported contribution level, aggregate, and zero-compensation utility construct the source payoff. Changing one agent’s action to contribution changes that payoff by b/n-c, independently of the other actions.

Summing the same individual utilities counts every contribution benefit n times and its private cost once. The resulting welfare coefficient b-c is positive, so unanimous contribution is socially maximal even though noncontribution is privately strictly dominant.

References