Semantic Target-Laundering Decision
Abstract
Decidable protected coordinates and report conditions yield an exact laundering decision.
Theorem 1.1 (The laundering predicate has a certified Boolean decision).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DefinitionEscapeRegrade/SemanticTargetLaunderingDecision.target_laundering_decision_nonempty (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For an arbitrary regrade semantic frame, commitment and evidence equality, each of the seven protected-coordinate equalities, and strict time comparison are decidable. No finite carrier, verdict equality, inhabited commitment type, or verdict-change premise is used.
Dependent protected-coordinate extensionality first supplies equality decision for the complete coordinate record. The frozen body-level characterization then decides the laundering predicate, and the returned Boolean carries its exact correctness equivalence.
The same module transcribes the standard interpreter from the existing prospective-commitment and regrade-report carriers and proves a named specialization through that interpreter. This discharges obligation 57.2-E from definition-escape-completion-theory atom generic-residual-18a12b09c5e901f1df86ba136d7ef48402e6fbabd170dd510c85c64d00c8a9f8.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DefinitionEscapeRegrade/SemanticTargetLaunderingDecision.target_laundering_decision_nonempty - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/DefinitionEscapeRegrade/SemanticTargetLaunderingBundleElimination