Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Information-Complete Normative Divergence

Abstract

With distinct normative values, complete information permits disagreement; incomplete information permits consensus blind to a Boolean target.

Theorem 1.1 (Complete information permits normative divergence).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Deliberation/InformationCompleteNormativeDivergence.complete_information_permits_normative_divergence (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

For any nonempty state type and any two distinct normative values, an injective concept admits two normative functions that disagree at a state. The constant functions at the chosen values provide the disagreement, so informational completeness does not impose a unique norm.

For every noninjective concept, two equal Boolean normative functions witness consensus while a Boolean target remains impossible to recover from the concept. Consensus here is equality of the two normative functions, not a claim that all possible norms agree.

A collision in the concept fiber supplies the separating target: it distinguishes states that the concept identifies, and therefore cannot factor through any Boolean answer on the concept’s codomain. Agreement can thus coexist with blindness to a relevant target.

References