Registration Template and Helpers
Abstract
Typed constructors generate primitive inventories and laws over explicit canonical arenas.
The separation family serves two gold registrations. Bijection, admitted surjection, anchored separation, context selection, exact design, completion exchange, scope tables, and two-step binary protocols each serve one gold registration and are helpers under the reuse criterion.
Definition 1.1 (Single CUT realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.cutRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.cutRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
One typed function supplies the single CUT readout, with no point anchors.
Definition 1.2 (Bijection helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.bijectiveArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.bijectiveArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The generated law requires bijectivity of the realization’s readout.
Definition 1.3 (Separation realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.separationRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.separationRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Two typed functions supply coarse and fine CUT readouts.
Definition 1.4 (Separation template).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.separationArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.separationArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The generated law requires two states with equal coarse readouts and different fine readouts.
Definition 1.5 (Admitted-surjection realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.admittedSurjectionRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.admittedSurjectionRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
A function supplies a CUT readout and a decidable predicate supplies a Boolean ADMIT readout.
Definition 1.6 (Admitted-surjection helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.admittedSurjectionArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.admittedSurjectionArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Every output has an admitted preimage, and two admitted states have distinct outputs.
Definition 1.7 (Anchored-separation realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.anchoredSeparationRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.anchoredSeparationRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Two CUT readouts, two ADMIT predicates, and two point anchors supply the primitive inventory.
Definition 1.8 (Anchored-separation helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.anchoredSeparationArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.anchoredSeparationArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The anchors satisfy their admission predicates, agree in one readout, differ in the other, and preclude a recovery map.
Definition 1.9 (Context-selection realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.contextSelectionRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.contextSelectionRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Two shared readouts, three Boolean parameters, two ADMIT predicates, and two anchors supply the context inventory.
Definition 1.10 (Context-selection helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.contextSelectionArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.contextSelectionArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The law records agreement of the shared readouts, variation of all three parameters, and admission at the two anchors.
Definition 1.11 (Exact-design realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.exactDesignRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.exactDesignRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Two Boolean functions supply the experimental CUT readouts.
Definition 1.12 (Exact-design helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.exactDesignArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.exactDesignArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Each readout alone is noninjective; the joint readout is injective and requires both experiments.
Definition 1.13 (Completion-exchange realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.completionExchangeRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.completionExchangeRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Two state transitions supply FLOW readouts and one observation supplies a CUT readout.
Definition 1.14 (Completion-exchange helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.completionExchangeArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.completionExchangeArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The law requires noncommuting transitions and different kernels for the two completion orders, using the existing unbounded predictiveProjection.
Definition 1.15 (Scope-table realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.scopeTableRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.scopeTableRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Three decidable predicates supply Boolean ADMIT readouts.
Definition 1.16 (Scope-table helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.scopeTableArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.scopeTableArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Explicit coordinate functions compare the three local marginals; no state satisfies all three admission predicates.
Definition 1.17 (Binary sensor inventory).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.binaryFamilySignature
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.binaryFamilySignature (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
An arbitrary finite sensor type indexes Boolean CUT readouts over the supplied carrier.
Definition 1.18 (Binary sensor realization).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.binaryFamilyRealization
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.binaryFamilyRealization (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The supplied sensor family defines the readouts, with no point anchors.
Definition 1.19 (First successful natural index).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.firstSuccess
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.firstSuccess (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
A natural-number predicate has its least successful index when a witness exists, and zero otherwise.
Theorem 1.20 (Witnessed minimum transport).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.firstSuccess_eq_find
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.firstSuccess_eq_find (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
An existence witness identifies firstSuccess with Nat.find for the same predicate.
Definition 1.21 (Two-step binary protocol statement).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepStatement
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepStatement (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The first sensor divides four named states into pairs. A history-dependent second question identifies the state; individual sensors and smaller depths fail, while adaptive and static costs are two and three.
Definition 1.22 (Two-step protocol helper).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepArena
Formalization. D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepArena (✓ std3).
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The supplied finite arena and sensors generate the protocol law with realization-dependent adaptive and static minima.
Theorem 1.23 (Two-step registration bridge).
Lean statement: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepLegacy
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepLegacy (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Existence witnesses transport the two source Nat.find costs to the generated law using firstSuccess_eq_find.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.admittedSurjectionArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.admittedSurjectionRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.anchoredSeparationArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.anchoredSeparationRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.bijectiveArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.binaryFamilyRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.binaryFamilySignature - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.completionExchangeArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.completionExchangeRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.contextSelectionArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.contextSelectionRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.cutRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.exactDesignArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.exactDesignRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.firstSuccess - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.firstSuccess_eq_find - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.scopeTableArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.scopeTableRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.separationArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.separationRealization - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepArena - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepLegacy - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/RegistrationTemplates.twoStepStatement - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Coding/AdaptiveResidueIdentification
- Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Completion/CommutingCompletionExchange
- Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Faithfulness/JointFaithfulnessLeibnizCriterion
- Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/InformationEscape/TheoremUnit