Observation Order Equivalence
Abstract
Factorization equals partition-open inclusion; defects are antitone.
Theorem 1.1 (Readout refinement is exactly partition-open inclusion).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/ObservationOrderEquivalence.refines_iff_partition_open_inclusion (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
A factorization of the coarse readout through the fine readout pulls every coarse observation-open set into the fine partition topology.
On an inhabited source, the reverse open-set inclusion recovers fiber constancy of the coarse readout along fine fibers and hence a refinement factor.
The equivalence is conditional on the displayed Nonempty source instance; no converse is asserted for an empty source.
Theorem 1.2 (Target defects are antitone under readout refinement).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/ObservationOrderEquivalence.defectRelation_antitone_of_refines (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Let the coarse readout factor through the fine readout. Equality of fine observations then implies equality of coarse observations.
A pair that is still indistinguishable to the fine readout while being distinguished by the target is therefore also a defect of the coarse readout.
The conclusion is the displayed one-way subset inclusion; equality of defect relations is not claimed.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/ObservationOrderEquivalence.defectRelation_antitone_of_refines - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/ObservationOrderEquivalence.refines_iff_partition_open_inclusion - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/ResidualSeparationTopology
- Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/TargetContinuityFactorization
- Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Topology/ContinuousRefinementObservationTopology