Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Response Upgrade Well-Foundedness

Abstract

Finite T2-compliant response traces cannot retry forever: a sufficiently long same-stimulus trace must stop or change class, and blind retries are decidable.

Theorem 1.1 (T2 response traces stop or change class).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/OperationalTuition/ResponseUpgradeWellFounded.t2_response_upgrade_well_founded (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

A response event records a stimulus, response class, response value, and an explicit stop bit. T2 compliance is a structural predicate requiring the nonterminal responses in each finite stimulus/class slice to be duplicate-free.

The finite response alphabet bounds every duplicate-free list by its Fintype cardinality. If a same-stimulus trace exceeds that bound, the compliant trace therefore contains a stopping event or an event whose response class has changed.

Theorem 1.2 (Blind-retry T2 violations are decidable).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/OperationalTuition/ResponseUpgradeWellFounded.t2_violation_decidable (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

All carriers and the finite trace are explicit, so the universal T2 predicate has a decision procedure. The Boolean classifier returns true exactly for its negation.

A two-event trace repeating the sole response in a one-element alphabet is a compiled blind-retry witness and is classified as a violation.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/OperationalTuition/ResponseUpgradeWellFounded.t2_response_upgrade_well_founded
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/OperationalTuition/ResponseUpgradeWellFounded.t2_violation_decidable