Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Perfect restricted bases of size s + 1

Abstract

Every finite abelian group with a perfect restricted basis of size s + 1 is cyclic.

Definition 1.1 (Perfect restricted s-bases).

Formalization. D5/S3/FiniteGroups/BajnokBersonJustPerfectRestrictedBasis.IsPerfectRestrictedBasis (✓ std3).

Citation. B. Bajnok, C. Berson and H. A. Just (2022). On Perfect Bases in Finite Abelian Groups. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2022.15.525. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13675v1.

Commentary.

The paper states (abstract, p. 1): “A is a perfect restricted s-basis of G if each element of G can be written uniquely as the sum of at most s distinct elements of A.” The Lean predicate uses a finset T of distinct elements, requires T ⊆ A and T.card ≤ s, and records the sum over T. The empty finset supplies the empty sum.

Definition 1.2 (The cyclic conclusion for Question 6).

Formalization. D5/S3/FiniteGroups/BajnokBersonJustPerfectRestrictedBasis.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. B. Bajnok, C. Berson and H. A. Just (2022). On Perfect Bases in Finite Abelian Groups. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2022.15.525. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13675v1.

Commentary.

Question 6 (p. 8) asks: “Are there any noncyclic groups that have a perfect restricted s-basis of size s + 1?” The displayed proposition answers the question for finite abelian groups: positive s, a basis with cardinality s + 1, and the perfect restricted basis condition imply IsAddCyclic.

Theorem 1.3 (Question 6 has a negative answer).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/FiniteGroups/BajnokBersonJustPerfectRestrictedBasis.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/bajnok-berson-just-2022-perfect-restricted-bases-question-6 (proved) by D5/S3/FiniteGroups/BajnokBersonJustPerfectRestrictedBasis.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. B. Bajnok, C. Berson and H. A. Just (2022). On Perfect Bases in Finite Abelian Groups. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2022.15.525. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13675v1.

Commentary.

The proof first identifies the admissible subsets with the proper subsets of A, giving the odd cardinality 2 raised to A.card minus 1 for G. For each a in A, the map that toggles a is a fixed-point-free involution on every selected coset of the subgroup generated by a, so each such fiber has even cardinality. Lagrange’s divisibility and the proper-subset count make the subgroup cardinality odd; excluding the coset containing the full subset forces that subgroup to be all of G.

References