Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Intertwining Defect Propagation

Abstract

An operator intertwining defect telescopes and propagates with exact norm bounds.

Theorem 1.1 (Intertwining defects telescope exactly).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.intertwining_defect_telescope (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Let T and A be continuous linear endomorphisms of possibly distinct spaces, and let C map the source space to the target. The time-n defect is the sum of the one-step defect transported by the remaining powers of A and the elapsed powers of T.

A noncommutative-ring induction proves exact cancellation. At time zero the finite sum is empty and both sides are zero.

Theorem 1.2 (The propagated defect has a weighted norm bound).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.norm_intertwining_defect_le (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The triangle inequality, the operator-norm composition bound, and the norm bound for powers turn the exact telescope into the finite weighted sum stated in the source corollary.

No finite-dimensional, completeness, inner-product, or nontrivial carrier assumption is used.

Theorem 1.3 (Uniform norm bounds give linear propagation).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.uniform_norm_intertwining_defect_le (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

If both operator norms are at most L, every summand is at most L to the power n minus one times the one-step defect norm. There are exactly n summands.

The proof does not need L less than one. Natural subtraction is truncated, so at n equal to zero its exponent is zero while the leading factor n makes the right side zero.

Theorem 1.4 (The bound on A is necessary).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.left_norm_bound_is_necessary (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

On the one-dimensional real space take A as multiplication by two, C as the identity, T as zero, L as one, and n as three. The bound on T holds, but the claimed conclusion without the bound on A is false.

Theorem 1.5 (The bound on T is necessary).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.right_norm_bound_is_necessary (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The symmetric one-dimensional counterexample takes A as zero, C as the identity, T as multiplication by two, L as one, and n as three. The bound on A holds, but the conclusion without the bound on T is false.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.intertwining_defect_telescope
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.left_norm_bound_is_necessary
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.norm_intertwining_defect_le
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.right_norm_bound_is_necessary
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/Approximation/IntertwiningDefectPropagation.uniform_norm_intertwining_defect_le