Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Qubit Empirical-Image Reflexive Gap

Abstract

The exact qubit density-state readout is predicate-complete on its image but reflexively incomplete.

Theorem 1.1 (Qubit empirical completeness does not imply reflexive completeness).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Existence/QubitEmpiricalImageReflexiveGap.qubit_empirical_image_reflexive_gap (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

In the displayed statement, ofMatrixInv denotes the Lean conversion CStarMatrix.ofMatrix.symm, which reads a density state’s underlying matrix as a C*-matrix; R is the context readout. There is a three-context rank-one qubit observer whose readout R is injective on the full density-state subtype.

For that same R, pullback from Boolean predicates on its realized range is bijective, while every density-state-indexed catalog into that predicate space is non-surjective.

This specializes the abstract strict-gap theorem to the existing public qubit witness. It does not include concrete context-subfamily minimality because the source Pauli context is private.

References