Qubit Empirical-Image Reflexive Gap
Abstract
The exact qubit density-state readout is predicate-complete on its image but reflexively incomplete.
Theorem 1.1 (Qubit empirical completeness does not imply reflexive completeness).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/Existence/QubitEmpiricalImageReflexiveGap.qubit_empirical_image_reflexive_gap (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
In the displayed statement, ofMatrixInv denotes the Lean conversion CStarMatrix.ofMatrix.symm, which reads a density state’s underlying matrix as a C*-matrix; R is the context readout. There is a three-context rank-one qubit observer whose readout R is injective on the full density-state subtype.
For that same R, pullback from Boolean predicates on its realized range is bijective, while every density-state-indexed catalog into that predicate space is non-surjective.
This specializes the abstract strict-gap theorem to the existing public qubit witness. It does not include concrete context-subfamily minimality because the source Pauli context is private.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Observer/Existence/QubitEmpiricalImageReflexiveGap.qubit_empirical_image_reflexive_gap - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/ObservationTopology/LosslessReadoutReflexiveGap
- Dependency: D5/S3/Observer/Existence/EmpiricalReflexiveSeparation