Projection Commutator Identity
Abstract
A complementary split expresses a commutator through its two directed cross blocks, and projection commutation is exactly their joint vanishing.
Theorem 1.1 (The commutator is the difference of the directed cross blocks).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/HiddenFlow/ProjectionCommutatorIdentity.commutator_eq_cross_blocks (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
In any possibly noncommutative ring, let Q be the complement 1 minus P. Then P times T minus T times P equals the P-to-Q cross term minus the Q-to-P cross term.
Inserting P plus Q as the identity on both sides separates the two diagonal PTP terms, which cancel. No idempotence or nondegeneracy condition on P is required, so the identity also includes the degenerate complements P = 0 and P = 1 and the zero ring.
Lemma 1.2 (Visible projection commutes exactly when both cross blocks vanish).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/HiddenFlow/ProjectionCommutatorIdentity.visible_projection_commutes_iff_cross_blocks_eq_zero (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For complementary subspaces V and R of a finite complex coordinate space, the matrix of the projection onto V along R commutes with T exactly when both directed cross-component maps are zero.
The visible-after-T-after-hidden block measures flow from R into V, while the hidden-after-T-after-visible block measures flow from V into R. Their simultaneous vanishing is the reducing condition, so it is equivalent to projection commutation.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Observer/HiddenFlow/ProjectionCommutatorIdentity.commutator_eq_cross_blocks - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Observer/HiddenFlow/ProjectionCommutatorIdentity.visible_projection_commutes_iff_cross_blocks_eq_zero - Dependency: D5/S3/Observer/HiddenFlow/InfinitesimalReducingCriterion