Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Posterior Collapse under Singular Laws

Abstract

Singular transcript laws make binary posteriors collapse under generated information.

Definition 1.1 (Binary prior mixture).

Formalization. D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.binaryPriorMixture (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The prior weights the two transcript laws, including totalized endpoints.

Definition 1.2 (Likelihood posterior).

Formalization. D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.likelihoodPosterior (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

This is the exact binary likelihood normalization displayed in section 225.

Definition 1.3 (Likelihood posterior process).

Formalization. D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.likelihoodPosteriorProcess (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The likelihood posterior is evaluated at every natural observation time.

Definition 1.4 (Conditional posterior process).

Formalization. D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.binaryPosteriorProcess (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The posterior is the conditional expectation of a separating-event indicator.

Theorem 1.5 (Singular laws have collapsing posterior).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.mutually_singular_laws_have_collapsing_posterior (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

A perfect separator and conditional-expectation convergence give limits one and zero under the two laws.

Theorem 1.6 (A zero prior prevents first-state completion).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.zero_prior_is_necessary (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

With constant unit likelihood, the posterior remains zero.

Theorem 1.7 (A unit prior prevents second-state completion).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.one_prior_is_necessary (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

With constant unit likelihood, the posterior remains one.

Theorem 1.8 (Equal laws have no perfect separator).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.equal_law_is_not_perfectly_separable (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

One Dirac law cannot assign both full and zero mass to the same event.

Theorem 1.9 (The empty transcript type has no probability law).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.empty_transcript_has_no_probability_law (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Probability normalization forces the sample type to be nonempty.

Theorem 1.10 (Singleton probability laws coincide).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.unit_probability_laws_are_equal (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Every measurable singleton event is either empty or universal.

Theorem 1.11 (The bottom Boolean filtration is not generating).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.trivial_filtration_does_not_generate_bool (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

A constant bottom filtration never reveals the nontrivial Boolean event.

Theorem 1.12 (Generation is necessary for posterior collapse).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.filtration_generation_is_necessary (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Singular Boolean Dirac laws with half prior retain posterior one half under the bottom filtration.

References

  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.binaryPosteriorProcess
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.binaryPriorMixture
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.empty_transcript_has_no_probability_law
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.equal_law_is_not_perfectly_separable
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.filtration_generation_is_necessary
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.likelihoodPosterior
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.likelihoodPosteriorProcess
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.mutually_singular_laws_have_collapsing_posterior
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.one_prior_is_necessary
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.trivial_filtration_does_not_generate_bool
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.unit_probability_laws_are_equal
  • Truth anchor: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularPosteriorCollapse.zero_prior_is_necessary
  • Dependency: D5/S3/Observer/MeasureSeparation/SingularProbabilityPerfectSeparator