Original-Side Fragment Mesh Error
Abstract
Localize actual fragment mesh errors on the original mass, then separate unconditional probability reductions from the remaining scalar perpetuity identity.
Theorem 1.1 (A positive boundary witnessed by the original mass).
Lean statement: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.original_mesh_boundary_witness
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.original_mesh_boundary_witness (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For nonnegative retained mass x and deletion d, positive mesh width h, d smaller than delta, original mass x+d at most R, and different natural floor indices, there exists a natural k between 1 and floor(R/h). The original mass belongs to [kh,kh+delta). The witness is floor(x/h)+1. Floor monotonicity places the new mass above this boundary, while the strict upper bound on x and on d places it below kh+delta. No restriction delta<h is imposed.
Theorem 1.2 (An unconditional finite boundary reduction).
Lean statement: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_original_boundary_probability
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_original_boundary_probability (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For the actual fragmentLaw with positive zeta, nonnegative epsilon, positive delta and h, and any real R, the probability of a changed mesh index with total mass at most R is bounded by ofReal(min(epsilon,zeta))/ofReal(delta), plus the sum of original-mass interval probabilities over k in [1,floor(R/h)]. The existing retained/deleted partition and deletion tail are consumed directly. Neither a density nor a distributional fixed point is a hypothesis of this reduction.
Theorem 1.3 (The exact remaining distributional hypothesis).
Lean statement: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mass_interval_of_perpetuity
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mass_interval_of_perpetuity (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The scalar mass law is explicitly the pushforward of the existing fragmentLaw by c mapped to c.mass. Assuming this very pushforward equals its uniformScaleMixture, its probability of [x,x+delta) is at most ofReal(delta/zeta). Probability normalization and nonnegative support are derived from the actual finite-measure carrier. The perpetuity equality itself is not proved in this module and is not replaced by a new axiom.
Theorem 1.4 (An explicit finite-window estimate).
Lean statement: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_window_of_perpetuity
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_window_of_perpetuity (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
Under the same scalar perpetuity equality, the actual windowed mesh-error probability is at most ofReal(min(epsilon,zeta))/ofReal(delta) plus floor(R/h) times ofReal(delta/zeta). The finite union is indexed by positive boundaries only. When floor(R/h) is zero its contribution is zero. All positivity assumptions and the full distributional equality remain in the Lean signature.
Theorem 1.5 (An unconditional bound outside the mass window).
Lean statement: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_total_mass_tail
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_total_mass_tail (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For positive zeta and R, the probability that the original total mass is at least R is at most ofReal(zeta)/ofReal(R). The proof obtains the actual total-mass first moment by applying the existing fragment-law integral theorem to the constant test function one, then reuses Markov’s inequality. There is no perpetuity, independence or anti-concentration premise here.
Theorem 1.6 (A full-space mesh estimate).
Lean statement: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_global_of_perpetuity
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_global_of_perpetuity (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For positive R as well as the finite-window assumptions, split the actual mesh-error event into total mass at least R and the windowed event. The resulting bound is zeta/R plus min(epsilon,zeta)/delta plus floor(R/h)*delta/zeta, represented in extended nonnegative reals. The scalar perpetuity equality remains an explicit hypothesis. This statement does not certify any of the original 152 trial-integral inequalities.
The retained fragment measure can have an atom at zero. Applying the interval bound to the original total mass is therefore a substantive choice. The scalar dyadic-Poisson/perpetuity identification is still an independent formalization obligation. No Lean kernel, axiom-closure or Scribe-emission success follows from the presence of these source files or their declaration handles.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mass_interval_of_perpetuity - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_global_of_perpetuity - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_original_boundary_probability - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_mesh_window_of_perpetuity - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.fragment_total_mass_tail - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentOriginalMesh.original_mesh_boundary_witness - Dependency: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentMeshTruncation
- Dependency: D5/S3/PrimeGaps/FragmentUniformSmoothing