Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Stationarity does not imply tabletop time reversibility

Abstract

A full-rank steady qutrit prior need not admit fixed-dilation tabletop reversal.

Definition 1.1 (Forward dilation channel).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.channel (✓ std3).

Citation. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

Equation (1), page 2: “N(•) = Tr_E[U_SE (• ⊗ ξ_E) U_SE†]”. S and E are finite index types with decidable equality; xi denotes ξ. The product index S × E places the system before the environment. PartialTraceMutualInformation.partialTraceRight traces out the environment.

Definition 1.2 (Hilbert–Schmidt adjoint of the dilation channel).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.channelAdjoint (✓ std3).

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

For the channel in equation (1), page 2, the Hilbert–Schmidt adjoint has action Tr_E[U†(Y ⊗ 1)U(1 ⊗ ξ)]. Matrix multiplication has the displayed order; the two identity matrices act on E and S respectively. This expression is derived from the forward dilation by cyclicity of the trace.

Definition 1.3 (Petz recovery map).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.petz (✓ std3).

Citation. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

Definition 1, equation (2), page 2: “N̂_γ^(P)(•) ≡ √γ N†( (1/√N(γ)) • (1/√N(γ)) ) √γ.” gamma denotes γ. CFC.sqrt is the positive square root; inverse means the matrix inverse. The question below restricts gamma to positive definite matrices and assumes channel U xi gamma = gamma, so these square roots are invertible in the instance used here.

Definition 1.4 (Reverse map with the same interaction).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.tabletopReverse (✓ std3).

Citation. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

Definition 2, equation (3), page 2: “N̂_ξ′^(T)(•) ≡ Tr_E[U_SE† (• ⊗ ξ′_E) U_SE].” eta denotes ξ′. U is the very same interaction used in the forward map; only the environmental state may change.

Definition 1.5 (Tabletop time reversibility for a prior).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.IsTTR (✓ std3).

Citation. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

Definition 2, equation (4), page 2: the channel is tabletop time-reversible for a prior γ “if there exists ξ′ = ξ′_γ such that its Petz recovery map N̂_γ^(P) is given by N̂_γ^(P) = N̂_ξ′^(T)”. The existential eta is positive semidefinite and has trace one. Equality of the maps means equality on every system matrix X.

Definition 1.6 (The stationary-prior assertion).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

Section V, question 2, page 9: “In all of the examples we considered, a dynamics appears to be tabletop time-reversible whenever a prior state is a steady state. We do not have a proof that this is true in general, and leave it for a future investigation.” The assertion ranges over finite system and environment types, a unitary U, a positive semidefinite trace-one xi, and a positive definite trace-one gamma fixed by channel U xi. It asks for IsTTR for this fixed U and xi.

Theorem 1.7 (A qutrit stationary prior without tabletop reversal).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/song-kwon-scarani-2025-steady-prior-reversibility (refuted) by D5/S3/Quantum/Information/SongKwonScaraniSteadyPriorReversibility.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. M. Song, H. Kwon and V. Scarani (2025). Exact and approximate conditions of tabletop reversibility: when is Petz recovery cost-free?. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aea92d. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26895v1.

Commentary.

Take S = E = Fin 3, xi = Matrix.diagonal ![1/2, 1/3, 1/6], and gamma = Matrix.diagonal ![17/44, 13/44, 14/44]. The unitary exchanges (0,0) with (1,1), (1,0) with (2,2), and (2,0) with (0,2), with coefficient −Complex.I, and fixes (0,1), (1,2), and (2,1). The prior is positive definite, has trace one, and is stationary. For every environmental matrix eta, the tabletop output at (1,1) on Matrix.single 0 0 1 and at (2,2) on Matrix.single 1 1 1 both equal eta 0 0. The corresponding Petz entries are 13/51 and 7/39. Their inequality excludes every eta, including all density matrices. Only this fixed interaction is asserted; no statement about the whole continuous Hamiltonian family is proved here.

References