Resolved-count weak values
Abstract
Every resolved coherent-state weak value differs from the no-click value by the count times the single-photon weak value.
Theorem 1.1 (The first factorial moment of the exponential series).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.weighted_exp_hasSum (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
For every complex t, the sum of n t^n/n! is t exp(t). A shift by one in the exponential series and the factorial recurrence give the identity. Number insertion in a coherent state uses this weighted series; the second factorial moment of an exponential series also follows by a shift.
Definition 1.2 (The all-count proposition).
Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.claim (✓ std3).
Citation. H. M. Wiseman, A. M. Steinberg, M. Hallaji (2023). Obtaining a single-photon weak value from experiments using a strong (many-photon) coherent state. DOI: 10.1116/5.0137579. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15761v2.
Commentary.
Section V, page 6: “This supports earlier approximate results which suggested that if a photon-number resolving detector were used, the weak value post-selected on detecting m photons would exceed the no-click weak value by precisely m times the single-photon number. We leave a rigorous proof of this conjecture for future work.” The encoding has k+1 modes, with mode 0 probed and detected; A and B are arbitrary passive evolutions. Alpha is nonzero, m is a natural count, and all conditional values require nonzero probabilities. For m=0 the difference is zero without a single-photon denominator.
Theorem 1.3 (The resolved-count identity).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.result (✓ std3). ∎
Resolves. Problems/wiseman-steinberg-hallaji-2023-resolved-count-weak-values (proved) by D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.result.
Source. Repository-derived.
Acknowledgement. H. M. Wiseman, A. M. Steinberg, M. Hallaji (2023). Obtaining a single-photon weak value from experiments using a strong (many-photon) coherent state. DOI: 10.1116/5.0137579. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15761v2.
Commentary.
Number insertion creates one excitation in the coherent field. Its detected-mode contribution is proportional to m, while the ignored modes contribute a term independent of m. Subtracting the zero-count value cancels that term; scaling the input amplitude cancels from the remaining ratio. A positive count with nonzero probability also guarantees a nonzero single-photon probability.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.claim - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.result - Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Quantum/ResolvedCountWeakValue.weighted_exp_hasSum - Dependency: D5/S3/Quantum/PassiveFockModel