Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Nonuniqueness of the multilayer percolation determinant zero

Abstract

Three layers with degree identically 65 give three distinct interior zeros of the multilayer percolation determinant, refuting its conjectured uniqueness.

Definition 1.1 (The multilayer matrix).

Formalization. D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.multilayerMatrix (✓ std3).

Citation. Saikat Guha; Donald Towsley; Philippe Nain; Çağatay Çapar; Ananthram Swami; Prithwish Basu (2016). Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062310. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7057v4.

Commentary.

Equation (3) of Guha, Towsley, Nain, Capar, Swami and Basu defines the matrix for M layers, excess-degree ratio C and occupation probability q. Here i and j range over Fin M, whose values are 0 through M − 1; the source indices are val(i) + 1 and val(j) + 1. The function choose is the natural binomial coefficient, zero when its lower argument exceeds its upper argument. Subtraction inside choose and in the exponents is natural subtraction; the binomial coefficients are cast to real numbers before their difference is taken. The definition allows every natural M and real C, q.

Definition 1.2 (Finitely supported degree distributions).

Formalization. D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.IsDegreeDistribution (✓ std3).

Citation. Saikat Guha; Donald Towsley; Philippe Nain; Çağatay Çapar; Ananthram Swami; Prithwish Basu (2016). Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062310. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7057v4.

Commentary.

The degree probabilities p(k) are nonnegative and sum to one. Finsupp(N,R) denotes the finitely supported real functions on the nonnegative integers; support(p) is the finite set where p is nonzero. Every displayed sum over support(p) is a finite sum. This is the finitely supported case of the source’s degree distribution p_k.

Definition 1.3 (The mean degree).

Formalization. D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.meanDegree (✓ std3).

Citation. Saikat Guha; Donald Towsley; Philippe Nain; Çağatay Çapar; Ananthram Swami; Prithwish Basu (2016). Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062310. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7057v4.

Commentary.

The source’s mean degree is z = sum_k k p_k. The map castReal sends a natural number to the corresponding real number. The definition applies to every finitely supported real function p; positivity is imposed in the conjecture.

Definition 1.4 (The excess-degree ratio).

Formalization. D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.excessRatio (✓ std3).

Citation. Saikat Guha; Donald Towsley; Philippe Nain; Çağatay Çapar; Ananthram Swami; Prithwish Basu (2016). Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062310. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7057v4.

Commentary.

The source sets C = sum_k (k − 1) k p_k / z. In this formula k is cast to R before subtracting one. The quotient uses real division, including its value at a zero denominator; the conjecture assumes that the mean degree is positive.

Definition 1.5 (The determinant uniqueness conjecture).

Formalization. D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. Saikat Guha; Donald Towsley; Philippe Nain; Çağatay Çapar; Ananthram Swami; Prithwish Basu (2016). Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062310. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7057v4.

Commentary.

For every M at least one and every finitely supported degree distribution with positive mean and excess-degree ratio greater than one, the determinant is asserted to have exactly one zero in the closed interval [0,1]. This is the finitely supported form of the conjecture following equation (5), repeated after Appendix C. A counterexample in this class also contradicts the assertion for arbitrary degree distributions.

Theorem 1.6 (Three distinct zeros for three layers).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/guha-et-al-2016-multilayer-determinant-root-nonuniqueness (refuted) by D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/Percolation/MultilayerDeterminantRootNonuniqueness.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. Saikat Guha; Donald Towsley; Philippe Nain; Çağatay Çapar; Ananthram Swami; Prithwish Basu (2016). Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062310. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7057v4.

Commentary.

Take M = 3 and the point mass at degree 65: p(65) = 1 and p(k) = 0 for k different from 65. It is a finitely supported degree distribution with z = 65 and C = 64. With u = q(1 − q)^2, v = q^2(1 − q) and w = q^3, the matrix is [[1 − 64u, −128v, −64w], [−128u, 1 − 192v, −64w], [−192u, −192v, 1 − 64w]].

Its determinant has the exact values 1, −36, 281 and −63 at q = 0, 1/4, 1/2 and 1, respectively. Each entry is a polynomial in q, so the determinant is continuous. The intermediate value theorem gives a zero in each of (0,1/4), (1/4,1/2) and (1/2,1). The endpoint values are nonzero, so these zeros lie in the open intervals and are distinct. Thus uniqueness in [0,1] fails even though z > 0 and C > 1.

This construction uses the source’s matrix and degree data. It refutes the uniqueness conjecture; the source’s separate proposition identifying the percolation threshold with the smallest zero is a different statement.

References