bibkey: fiebigmbirikaspilker2025lucas authors: Morgan Fiebig, aBa Mbirika, Jürgen Spilker year: 2025 title: “Period patterns, entry points, and orders in the Lucas sequences: theory and applications” doi: null url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14632v2 claim: ‘Conjecture 5.2. Set , and let and . Assume that both and are even. If and , then exactly one of the following two conclusions occur: (i) , or (ii) where , where is some odd integer and is the entry point of in .’ strata_touched:
- D5/S1/Recurrence/LucasEvenDescent license: citation-only triage: anchor
Period patterns, entry points, and orders in the Lucas sequences
The paper extends the modular theory of the Fibonacci and Lucas sequences to the
two-parameter Lucas sequences U_n(p,q) and V_n(p,q), where U_0 = 0,
U_1 = 1, V_0 = 2, V_1 = p, and both satisfy x_{n+1} = p*x_n - q*x_{n-1}.
Its statistics are the period pi(m), the entry point e(m), and the order
omega(m) = pi(m)/e(m).
Conjecture 5.2, quoted above, is the paper’s own open problem, carried in
Section 5 (“Open questions and future work”). The paper attributes it to
observations by Diego Garcia-Fernandezsesma and Oliver Lippard together with
Mbirika, following the Problem Session of the 21st International Fibonacci
Conference; the index form in clause (ii) is credited to Lippard. It repairs a
statement whose sufficiency direction the paper shows holds only when p or m
is odd, and asks what happens when both are even.
Three conventions of the paper are inherited by the conjecture and are quoted
here because the third is load-bearing: the parameters satisfy gcd(p,q) = 1
with p and q nonzero; the sequences are nondegenerate, so q != 0 and
alpha/beta is not a root of unity; and the moduli are restricted to those with
gcd(q,m) = 1, “for otherwise, the sequence may not be purely periodic
according to our definition”, which is also what guarantees that e_U(m)
exists. The entry point is defined there as “the least integer r>0 (if it
exists) such that m divides S_r”.
The module proves the conjecture. It does not use the first two conventions; the
implication holds without any nonzero, coprimality or nondegeneracy restriction
on p and q, so the formal statement is more general than the conjecture in
those parameters. It does use gcd(q,m) = 1.
Verified locator
- Abstract, version history and journal reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14632v2
- The conjecture and the three conventions were read in the LaTeX source obtained
from https://arxiv.org/e-print/2408.14632v2 (
Conjecture 5.2at the labelconj:aBa_Diego_Oliver; the modulus convention at the labelconv:gcd_of_m_and_q_equals_1). - Journal reference as listed on that page: The Fibonacci Quarterly 63.2 (2025) 345-376.