bibkey: bubbolonicaceres2026neighbourhood authors: Daniela Bubboloni; José Cáceres year: 2026 title: “The neighbourhood convexity” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.25912 url: https://arxiv.org/html/2608.25912v1 claim: “For a finite nonempty simple undirected graph, the paper defines neighbourhood convexity and conjectures that every upset of the neighbourhood preorder is neighbourhood-convex whenever the neighbourhood convexity is a convex geometry. Lemma 29(iii) already proves this for principal upsets; the conjecture concerns all upsets.” strata_touched:
- D5/S3/Combinatorics/Graph/BubboloniCaceresNeighbourhoodUpsets license: citation-only triage: anchor
The neighbourhood convexity
Verified locator
Daniela Bubboloni and José Cáceres, arXiv:2608.25912v1, version published
2026-08-26. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.25912. The primary versioned HTML is
https://arxiv.org/html/2608.25912v1. Its inspected SHA256 is
f10465fb6352f039eecb0bebd801fd4b839c50b7154c1c36e91a1409632e24af.
The verified scope is Sections 2.1 and 2.2, Definitions 3, 5, 9 and 28,
Proposition 12, Lemma 29, and the exact unnumbered upset conjecture in
“Conclusions and future lines of work” quoted below.
This note quotes and cites the source; it does not redistribute the paper.
Source scope and conjecture
Sections 2.1 and 2.2 fix a finite nonempty simple undirected graph and the convex-geometry condition. Definitions 3, 5 and 9 and Proposition 12 give
- ,
- , with ,
- ,
- and for ,
- .
The full geometry hypothesis is for every . Definition 28 orders vertices by . Lemma 29(iii) identifies the principal upset of with and proves that it is convex. Lemma 29(iv) proves that convex sets are upsets. Neither is a proof of arbitrary union closure.
In “Conclusions and future lines of work,” in the paragraph beginning “By exploring the connection with the neighbourhood preorder P(G),” the explicit unnumbered conjecture is:
We conjecture that, given a convex geometry (G,n), any upset in P(G) is an n-convex set, having checked it computationally for graphs up to 9 vertices.
The finite computations are author-reported and are not independently verified here. The separate conjecture about extreme points is not this assertion. The source’s statement remains a conjecture in the cited version; the project result is a separate proof, not a published settlement by the original authors.