Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Metadata
bibkey: aaronson2005postselection
authors: Scott Aaronson
year: 2005
title: Quantum Computing, Postselection, and Probabilistic Polynomial-Time
doi: null
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0412187
claim: Uniform polynomial quantum computation with postselection on a nonzero-probability measurement event has complexity class PostBQP equal to PP.
strata_touched: []
license: citation-only
triage: anchor

Conditional successful states carry a computational permission

Primary source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0412187. Definition 1 specifies PostBQP and Theorem 4 proves PostBQP = PP. The postselection event must have positive probability on every input; the acceptance conditions concern the second output conditional on that event.

A formula with variables defines the diagonal projector

Applying it to the uniform superposition has success probability , where is the number of satisfying assignments. When , the normalized successful state is the uniform superposition over those assignments. Direct repeated preparation needs expected attempts. The normalization is a conditional state description, not a deterministic trace-preserving operation available at unit cost.

When this success event has probability zero, so conditioning on this event alone does not even define a legal all-input PostBQP algorithm. The equality with PP concerns algorithms satisfying the complete postselection definition, rather than this unmodified filtering proposal.

The SAT clause projectors commute because they share the computational basis. For arbitrary quantum projections, sequential success need not mean simultaneous constraint satisfaction. For instance, the ranges of and have zero intersection, but applying these projections in that order to succeeds with probability . Any completion interpretation must preserve the actual order and the appropriate common constraint semantics.

This note concerns postselection as a computational resource. It does not turn static existence of a successful history, environmental purification, or ordinary bounded-error quantum computation into that resource.