Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Metadata
bibkey: ayad2025reversemultiples
authors: Mohamed Ayad; Rachid Bouchenna
year: 2025
title: "Which Integer Divides the Reverse of Any of Its Multiples?"
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15283699
url: https://math.colgate.edu/~integers/z37/z37.pdf
claim: "Problem 1: Let B ≥ 2 be any number base. Are the divisors of B² − 1 the only positive integers satisfying the property P*_B ?"
strata_touched:
  - D5/S1/Digit/AyadBouchennaReverseMultipleDivisors
license: citation-only
triage: anchor

Reversal of every multiple in an arbitrary base

Mohamed Ayad and Rachid Bouchenna, INTEGERS 25 (2025), #A37, published April 25, 2025. The following passages were checked against the printed pages of the source PDF on September 20, 2026.

Section 4.1, p. 8, defines reversal verbatim (with the displayed expression written inline):

For every positive integer , we call the integer . the reverse of in base

The same page defines the property verbatim:

A positive integer is said to have the property if divides for any positive multiple of , that is, if for every positive integer , if divides , then divides .

Proposition 5, p. 8, states verbatim:

Let be a number base and be a positive divisor of . Then has the property .

Problem 1, p. 9, asks verbatim:

Let be any number base. Are the divisors of the only positive integers satisfying the property ?

The formal reversal is exactly Nat.ofDigits B (Nat.digits B m).reverse. Nat.digits lists digits from least to most significant, so this expression evaluates the reversed positional expansion, including numbers ending in zero. The property quantifies over positive natural multiples. The characterization quantifies over every natural base at least two and every positive natural n. Its sufficiency direction is Proposition 5; its necessity direction answers Problem 1 affirmatively. The new characterization is repository-derived; the source supplies the definitions, the question, and the sufficiency direction.

Theorem 3 of the paper already settles base ten. No claim about Problem 2 or about the weakened property in section 4.2 is made here.

Verified locator

  • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15283699
  • URL: https://math.colgate.edu/~integers/z37/z37.pdf
  • Scope: Printed p. 8, section 4.1 definitions and Proposition 5; printed p. 9, Problem 1.