Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Metadata
bibkey: dumitrufrancomerino2026alternative
authors: R. Dumitru; J. Franco; A. Merino
year: 2026
title: "On The Linearization of Alternative Means"
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.25150
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25150v1
claim: "Can we characterize all functions f : (0, ∞) → (0, ∞) such that Aσ̂_f B is linearizable if and only if AB = BA and |Spec(A⁻¹♯B)| ≤ 2 ?"
strata_touched:
  - D5/S3/Quantum/Matrix/AlternativeMeanLinearization
license: citation-only
triage: anchor

Locator

Author text: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25150v1.

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.25150

R. Dumitru, J. Franco, and A. Merino, On The Linearization of Alternative Means, arXiv:2606.25150v1, §1, Remark 2.2, Definition 2.3, and Remarks 4.3–4.4.

Question and definitions

The Question in §1 (p. 3), restated as a problem in Remark 4.4, reads:

Question : Can we characterize all functions f : (0 , ∞) → (0 , ∞) such that Aσ̂_f B is linearizable if and only if AB = BA and |Spec(A⁻¹♯B)| ≤ 2 ?

Definition 2.3 (p. 5) reads:

Let f : (0 , ∞) → (0 , ∞) be a continuous function such that f(1) = 1. The alternative mean associated with f is the binary operation σ̂_f : P_n(D) × P_n(D) → P_n(D) defined by Aσ̂_f B = f(A⁻¹♯B) A f(A⁻¹♯B), (A , B ∈ P_n(D)).

Remark 2.2 (p. 4), items (1) and (2), reads in part:

(1) Let σ be a Kubo-Ando mean on P_n(D). For two matrices A , B ∈ P_n(D), we say that AσB is linearizable if there exists a , b ∈ R such that AσB = aA + bB.

(2) We denote by ♯ the geometric mean, i.e. the Kubo-ando mean corresponding to f(x) = √x. In particular, A♯B = A^{1/2}(A^{−1/2}BA^{−1/2})^{1/2}A^{1/2}, (A , B ∈ P_n(D)).

Remark 4.3 (p. 11) reads:

The proof of Theorem 4.2 shows that the operator monotonicity assumption can be weakened. Indeed, the spectral part only uses that f² is increasing and strictly concave, while the commutativity part uses that the function x ↦ f(x)/x is injective on (0 , ∞). Therefore, the conclusion of Theorem 4.2 remains valid for any continuous function f : (0 , ∞) → (0 , ∞), with f(1) = 1, and satisfying these two conditions.

The geometric mean is

Applying this to gives

where the last equality is equation (1). Positive definiteness makes the unique positive definite solution of that equation.

Repository-derived result

For complex positive definite matrices in every finite dimension, the companion theorem characterizes the functions in the Question. Let be continuous and positive on with , and set . The required equivalence holds for every dimension and every pair of positive definite matrices exactly when

  1. is injective on ;
  2. is injective on ;
  3. is strictly convex or strictly concave on .

Diagonalizing and writing turns linearizability into

The positive diagonal entries imply . Strict convexity or concavity permits at most two distinct eigenvalues. For distinct , writing and , the diagonal equations give

The two injectivity conditions make this nonzero, forcing the corresponding entries of to vanish. Thus commutes with and hence with . Conversely, commutation of and implies commutation of and through the continuous functional calculus. Two spectral values permit interpolation of by , proving linearizability.

Necessity uses and for each injectivity condition. A collinear triple in the graph of gives a linearizable diagonal pair in dimension three with three spectral values. Continuity then makes the nonzero adjacent-slope difference have constant sign on the connected domain , yielding strict convexity or strict concavity.

Neighboring references

Remark 4.3 supplies a sufficient condition rather than this full characterization. Questions about other mean families mentioned in the source are not settled by the companion theorem.

ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED

No exhaustive literature or priority claim is established. The formal theorem concerns complex matrices; real and quaternionic extensions are mathematical reasoning rather than formal results of this module.