Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Metadata
bibkey: zhang2026weakmajorizationtaylor
authors: T. Zhang
year: 2026
title: 'Weak majorization inequalities for the cubic and quartic coefficients of e^{(A+B)t} versus e^{At}e^{Bt}'
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.07286
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07286
claim: 'Conjecture 5.5 compares the nonincreasing eigenvalue lists of (A+B)^k and the Hermitian part of the ordered binomial coefficient for all Hermitian A and B and every k at least five, without a positivity assumption.'
strata_touched:
  - D5/S3/Quantum/Matrix/TaylorMajorization/Defs
  - D5/S3/Quantum/Matrix/TaylorMajorization/Result
license: citation-only
triage: anchor

Taylor coefficients and weak majorization

T. Zhang, Weak majorization inequalities for the cubic and quartic coefficients of e^{(A+B)t} versus e^{At}e^{Bt}, arXiv:2601.07286v1 (12 January 2026).

Verified locator

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.07286

Source version: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07286v1

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07286

Section 5, Conjecture 5.5; notation in Section 1 and the abstract. The pinned text is version 1. The abstract and Section 1 define as all complex Hermitian matrices of size . The conjecture states:

For A, B ∈ Hₙ and every k ≥ 5, λ(H^k) ≺_w λ(R_k).

Here , and . The eigenvalue lists are nonincreasing, and weak majorization compares all initial sums, including the full trace sum. There is no positivity assumption on or .

Scope

The source proves the comparisons for and supplies a sufficient commutator-decomposition condition for higher orders. Its singular-value Problem 1.1 is a separate question. The shifted Pauli refutation of Conjecture 5.5 is a repository result, not a result attributed to Zhang.