Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help


bibkey: fulsche2025wiener authors: Robert Fulsche, Franz Luef, Reinhard F. Werner year: 2025 title: “Wiener’s Tauberian theorem in classical and quantum harmonic analysis” doi: null url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08678v2 claim: “Wiener’s approximation theorem: translates of S in L1(G) span a dense subspace exactly when the Fourier zero sets have empty intersection; bounded convolution cancellation on the real line is a duality corollary.” strata_touched:

  • D5/S3/Fourier/SmoothConvolutionUniqueness license: citation-only triage: anchor

Wiener’s approximation theorem and bounded convolution cancellation

Verified locator

  • Versioned source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08678v2
  • Research-author preprint, arXiv:2405.08678v2, Theorem 2.1 (Wiener’s approximation theorem), printed page 3, Section 2: https://arxiv.org/html/2405.08678v2#S2.Thmthm1a
  • PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.08678v2
  • Group, Haar measure, Euclidean example and Fourier convention: Section 2, printed pages 2-3, HTML S2.p1, S2.Thmthm1 and S2.p2. Translation and reflection: page 3, S2.p5. Complex dual pairing and L-infinity conventions: Section 2.1, page 4, S2.SS1.p1 and S2.SS1.p2.
  • Verification used the captured versioned HTML clauses and PDF page extracts in the supplied source packet; no fresh source retrieval was performed. The arXiv revision timestamp is September 14, 2025, 16:15:37 UTC; the PDF title-page date is September 16, 2025. These are distinct facts.

Source theorem

Theorem 2.1 states that, for a subset S of L1(G), translates of functions in S span a dense subspace of L1(G) if and only if the intersection of their Fourier zero sets in the dual group is empty. The standing group is locally compact, abelian and Hausdorff, with a choice of Haar measure. The Euclidean example uses Lebesgue measure and characters x -> exp(i x eta), with Fourier transform given by integration against the conjugate character. A singleton is regular exactly when its Fourier transform vanishes nowhere (page 3, S2.p3).

Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 on page 3 give Tauberian consequences concerning limits and closed translation-invariant subspaces, respectively. No separate numbered zero-convolution cancellation theorem is attributed to this source here.

Specialized corollary and correspondence

The real additive group is second-countable and locally compact abelian; Lebesgue volume is its Haar measure. Let k and g be complex-valued functions on the real line, with k integrable. Assume g is almost-everywhere strongly measurable and there exists a real M >= 0 bounding |g(y)| for every real y. Assume the Fourier transform of k is nowhere zero and integral k(u) g(y-u) du = 0 for every real y.

An almost-everywhere strongly measurable complex function has a Borel measurable representative equal to it almost everywhere. The pointwise bound implies an essential bound, so this representative defines an L-infinity class. The second-countable duality convention on page 4 identifies that space with the complex-linear dual of L1 by the bilinear pairing integral h(u) f(u) du, without conjugation of either function.

Use the reflected representative to define Lambda(h) = integral h(u) g(-u) du. This is a continuous complex-linear functional with |Lambda(h)| <= M ||h||_1. With the source translation alpha_x k(u) = k(u-x), the change of variable v = u-x gives Lambda(alpha_x k) = integral k(v) g(-x-v) dv = 0. Theorem 2.1 applied to S = {k} makes the translate span dense, hence Lambda vanishes on L1. Injectivity of the stated dual identification implies that g(-u) is zero almost everywhere. Reflection preserves Lebesgue measure, so g itself is zero almost everywhere.

Replacing a representative on a null set leaves each convolution integral unchanged: for each fixed y, the map u -> y-u preserves null sets. This argument does not require a common exceptional set for all real y. All the integrals above exist by the L1 bound times M.

The pinned Fourier convention is FT(k)(xi) = integral exp(-2 pi i u xi) k(u) du. The source’s angular frequency eta equals 2 pi xi. This bijection of real frequencies preserves nowhere-vanishing, so the normalization changes no hypothesis of the density argument.

The public declaration D5/S3/Fourier/SmoothConvolutionUniqueness.ae_eq_zero_of_smooth_fourier_convolution_eq_zero also assumes the Fourier transform of k is infinitely differentiable over the reals. This is an additional restriction of the specialized corollary; Theorem 2.1 does not need it. The paper does not print this exact Lean signature or its proof. No integrability, continuity, Fourier transform, support restriction or reciprocal-growth condition on g is added.

Proof exposition and attribution limits

The specialized proof divides compact smooth frequency tests by the smooth nowhere-zero Fourier transform of k, takes inverse Fourier transforms, and uses an L1/L1/bounded Fubini estimate. Compact frequency tests approximate compact smooth spatial tests in L1; the bounded reflected pairing passes to the limit, and test-function separation yields the almost-everywhere result. This proof description is separate from the source’s density/duality formulation. Classical theorem priority remains Wiener’s.

The preprint’s reference [27], printed page 29, cites N. Wiener, Tauberian theorems, Annals of Mathematics (2) 33 (1932), pages 1-100. The original 1932 body was not captured, so no original theorem number or statement page is asserted. The matching journal metadata lists DOI 10.1016/j.jfa.2025.111265, Journal of Functional Analysis 290(4), article 111265, cover date February 15, 2026. Its body was not read; the preprint’s theorem and page locators are not transferred to that edition. This note contains citation and paraphrase only.

Salem’s 1953 pages 1127-1128 historically invoke Wiener in a particular kernel problem. They are not the attribution for this generic theorem. The positive-halfline kernel, logarithmic transport and both implications of the Riemann-hypothesis equivalence are separate mathematical obligations.