Metadata
bibkey: braskchaves2017bellcommunication
authors: Jonatan Bohr Brask and Rafael Chaves
year: 2017
title: "Bell scenarios with communication"
doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aa5840
url: "https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08182v1"
claim: "In a bipartite Bell scenario where Alice's output may influence Bob's output (causal outcome-dependent models), the chained Bell inequality with Alice's outputs relabelled for every second input is valid for 3, 5, 7 and 9 inputs by vertex enumeration, is violated for even numbers of inputs up to 8, and is conjectured to hold for every odd number of inputs."
strata_touched:
- D5/S3/Quantum/Contextuality/OutcomeCommunicationChainedInequality
license: citation-only
triage: anchor
Brask and Chaves, Bell scenarios with communication
J. B. Brask and R. Chaves, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50(9), 094001 (2017); arXiv:1607.08182v1. Quotations are from the v1 TeX source.
In a causal outcome-dependent (COD) model the output of one party directly influences the output of the other, so the behaviour has the form For the chained Bell inequality in the bracket notation , , , the paper enumerates the vertices of the COD polytope and reports:
For even numbers of inputs (up to 8), we find that all symmetries can be violated. However, for 3,5,7, and 9 inputs, we find that the following inequality can be made valid for the COD model […] For the inequality to hold for the COD model, Alice’s outputs must be relabelled for every second input. That is for even . With this relabelling, we conjecture that (25) holds for any odd number of inputs.
Verified locator
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08182v1
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5840 (Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50(9), 094001; title, authors, journal, volume, issue and article number from Crossref).
- URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08182v1. The e-print member
Bell_comm_arXiv_v1.texhas 534 lines and md5e207a0023fa9c95a83583eef1d7d0158. Locations:- the COD model, Eq. (7), l. 150–155;
- the vertex enumeration, the inequality (25), the bracket notation, the relabelling and the conjecture, l. 317–325.