bibkey: krishna2022cstarschoenberg authors: K. Mahesh Krishna year: 2022 title: “C*-algebraic Schoenberg Conjecture” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.06653 url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06653v1 claim: “Section 2 defines the ordered derivative P′ and states Conjectures 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4; Theorem 2.2 proves the degree-two case of Conjecture 2.1.” strata_touched:
- D5/S3/Quantum/Algebra/CStarSchoenberg
- D5/S3/Quantum/Algebra/CStarDeBruinSharma
- D5/S3/Quantum/Algebra/CStarKushelTyaglov license: citation-only triage: anchor
Verified locator
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.06653
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06653v1
C*-algebraic Schoenberg Conjecture
K. Mahesh Krishna, “C*-algebraic Schoenberg Conjecture”, arXiv:2206.06653v1 (14 June 2022; single version), Section 2.
Let be a C*-algebra. Given for all with , we define where the term with cap is missing.
Conjecture 2.1 (C-algebraic Schoenberg Conjecture).* Let be a C*-algebra. Let , be a polynomial over with . If can be written as on with , then and
Conjecture 2.3 (C-algebraic de Bruin-Sharma Conjecture).* Let be a C*-algebra, and let be a polynomial over with . Assume that can be written as on with . If then and
Conjecture 2.4 (C-algebraic Kushel-Tyaglov Conjecture).* Let be a C*-algebra, and let be a polynomial over with . Assume that can be written as on with . Then and
Theorem 2.2. Conjecture 2.1 holds for C*-algebraic polynomials of degree 2.
The source proves Conjecture 2.1 for d = 2 (Theorem 2.2) and states that Conjecture 2.3 holds for d = 2. In Conjecture 2.4 the index is bound, and is otherwise free while the sums run to in two places. The encoding reads n as d.
The definition of P′ and Conjecture 2.1 begin on page 2; Conjecture 2.1 continues on page 3. Theorem 2.2 and Conjecture 2.3 occur on page 3. Conjecture 2.4 spans pages 3–4. In Conjecture 2.4, the encoding reads the printed n as d. Indices become zero-based Fin types, while the product order is retained.
The source quantifies over C*-algebras. The encoding quantifies over unital C*-algebras in Type, with PartialOrder and StarOrderedRing, and d ≥ 2. These are restrictions of the universal assertion, so a counterexample in this subclass refutes the source assertion. The counterexample has degree three, leaving the source’s degree-two result intact.