Metadata
bibkey: delascuevasetal2024invariantpolynomialdecompositions
authors: Gemma De las Cuevas; Andreas Klingler; Tim Netzer
year: 2024
title: "Polynomial decompositions with invariance and positivity inspired by tensors"
doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2024.05.025
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06680v2
claim: "The paper defines invariant decompositions of polynomials over weighted simplicial complexes with group actions, introduces factorizable (Omega,G) structures through a positive equivariant solution of a product system with right-hand side K_alpha^{-1}, uses factorizability as a hypothesis of its rank inequalities, shows that a free vertex action and the double edge with copy-swapping action are factorizable, and asks whether non-factorizable (Omega,G) structures exist."
strata_touched:
- D5/S3/Quantum/TensorNetworks/NonFactorizableDoubledTriangle
license: citation-only
triage: anchor
Polynomial decompositions with invariance and positivity inspired by tensors
G. De las Cuevas, A. Klingler and T. Netzer, arXiv:2109.06680v2; Linear Algebra and its Applications 698 (2024), 537–588. Quotations are from the v2 TeX source; displayed macros are expanded without changing the wording.
Weighted simplicial complexes (Definition def:wsc):
A weighted simplicial complex on is a map such that divides whenever .
A set is called a simplex of if . We will always assume that each singleton is a simplex, and call the elements the vertices of the weighted simplicial complex. We call a maximal simplex (with respect to inclusion) a facet of
contains each facet exactly -many times.
A group action on consists of an action on leaving invariant and
An action of on the set of multifacets such that the canonical collapse map is -linear.
Factorizability (Definition before Example “Factorizable group actions”):
We say that is factorizable if for each finite index set the following system of equations admits a solution with all and for all , , and : where
The open question (Question 38, PDF p. 28 of v2):
In fact, we are not aware of any non-factorizable structures, leading to the following open question.
Are there non-factorizable structures?
The conclusion repeats it as one of two “immediate” open questions. Proposition 39(iii) assumes factorizability for ; Proposition 39(iv) assumes a free action on a connected together with factorizability.
Verified locator
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06680v2
- URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06680v2 (the e-print is a single gzip file whose header names
Manuscript_final.tex; md5e601e0a3202f352cba4bf6d4d13e7db4, 2167 lines):- Definition
def:wsc, l. 318–341; - Definition
def:actionand the group action on a weighted simplicial complex, l. 395–440; - Definition (Factorizable), l. 1515–1522;
- Example (Factorizable group actions), l. 1528–1542;
- Question
qu:fact, l. 1544–1549; - Proposition
pro:inequalitites, l. 1553–1566; - the conclusion’s restatement, l. 2034–2035.
- Definition
- DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2024.05.025 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2024.05.025; Crossref lists Linear Algebra and its Applications, volume 698, pages 537–588, October 2024).