Metadata
bibkey: song2024causalclassification
authors: Minjeong Song; Varun Narasimhachar; Bartosz Regula; Thomas J. Elliott; Mile Gu
year: 2024
title: "Causal Classification of Spatiotemporal Quantum Correlations"
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.110202
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09336v2
claim: "The paper classifies two-qubit pseudo-density operators by their compatibility with spatial and temporal distribution mechanisms, characterizes temporal compatibility by R_AB = (id_A ⊗ Λ)K_AB for a quantum channel Λ, introduces an atemporality measure f, and asks whether atemporality is guaranteed by steering or Bell nonlocality."
strata_touched:
- D5/S3/Quantum/Contextuality/SteeringTemporalCompatibilityRefutation
license: citation-only
triage: anchor
Causal Classification of Spatiotemporal Quantum Correlations
M. Song, V. Narasimhachar, B. Regula, T. J. Elliott and M. Gu, arXiv:2306.09336v2 (2024-09-23); Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 110202 (2024). Quotations are from the v2 TeX source.
Spatial and temporal compatibility:
PDOs that lie outside of are referred to as \emph{aspatial}, and those that lie outside of are referred to as \emph{atemporal}.
The atemporality measure:
Consider first a \emph{forward atemporality} measure that is zero if and only if has statistics consistent with a temporal distribution mechanism from to ; and a \emph{reverse atemporality} measure that is zero if and only if has statistics consistent with a temporal distribution mechanism from to .
Temporal PDOs (Eq. (3)):
\R_{AB} = \left(\id_A \ten \overrightarrow{\Lambda} \right) \K_{AB}
where with being the first marginal, the anti-commutator, the identity operator, and the swap operator.
The question:
Some entangled states are not atemporal, so is atemporality a strictly stronger notion of quantum correlations? And if so, is it guaranteed by steering or Bell non-locality~\cite{wiseman2007steering}?
Verified locator
- URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09336v2 (source
main.tex, md5c5fe67a443f5759537cc8ec3fdd2b1d5):- spatial and temporal compatibility, l. 356;
- the atemporality measure, l. 377;
- Eq. (3), l. 395–399;
- the question, l. 469.
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.110202.