Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help


bibkey: ahiablekothakondawinter2026geometry authors: Jennifer Ahiable; Naga Bhavya Teja Kothakonda; Andreas Winter year: 2026 title: “The geometry of absolute separability and other convex matrix properties from spectrum” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.03390 url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03390v2 claim: “Conjecture 6.7 states equality of APPT maximum purity and the inscribed polytope maximum, with the spectra of equation (44). Theorem 6.2 proves that the linear condition (31) implies absolute PPT; Section 7 asks to show that (31) is sufficient for absolute separability.” strata_touched:

  • D5/S3/Quantum/Entanglement/AbsolutePPT/QutritPerturbationAttainment
  • D5/S3/Quantum/Entanglement/AbsolutePPT/QutritQuditMaximumPurity
  • D5/S3/Quantum/Entanglement/AbsoluteSeparability/AhiableKothakondaWinterEq31 license: citation-only triage: anchor

Verified locator

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03390

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03390v2

Conjecture 6.7

Page 29, verbatim statement (equation reference rendered as its printed number):

Let be the inscribed absolute PPT polytope with . Then and occurs at the spectra given by Eq. (44).

Inscribed-polytope maximum

Corollary 6.4, pages 26–27, verbatim source statement:

Let be the inscribed absolute PPT polytope with . The maximum achievable purity of a quantum state with spectrum is given by where Furthermore, the spectrum of the maximal purity state with is given by where the block size , and the eigenvalues and evaluate exactly to

Theorem 6.2 and the Section 7 question

Theorem 6.2, page 23, verbatim:

Given a mixed state with a decreasingly ordered eigenvalue spectrum , if the following linear inequality holds: then the spectrum lies within , and is absolutely PPT.

Section 7 (Conclusion), page 39:

Thus, another matter of interest is to resolve Conjecture 6.7 in the positive, and to show that the linear condition in Eq. (31) is sufficient for absolute separability: because then the maximum purity over all three sets must coincide.

Absolute separability convention

Page 2:

Within this class of states lies a convex and compact subset of separable states that remain separable after the transformation under all global unitaries in the unitary group , widely referred to as absolutely separable states.

Partial transpose convention

Page 2:

, where and , and denotes the standard matrix transpose.

Absolute PPT convention

Page 2:

Defined analogously to absolutely separable states, absolute PPT states are those states which remain PPT after global unitary rotations and have been completely characterized across all dimensions [17].

Page 11:

Suppose is the spectrum of a bipartite state. Then if and only if for all unitaries , (U\diag(\lambda)U^\dagger)^\Gamma \geq 0.

The matrix encoding uses the second-factor partial transpose on Fin 3 × Fin n. Its trace-squared purity is the real part of Matrix.trace (rho * rho). The qutrit sector substitutes m = 3 and t = n in Corollary 6.4. The two candidate purities become (3n + 8)/(3n + 2)^2 and 3/(8n).