Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help


bibkey: lee2026longrangeswap authors: Eunghyun Lee year: 2026 title: Integrability of multispecies long-range swap models with species-dependent interpolation doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/ae80b5 url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12136v1 claim: “Remark 3.1 conjectures that every reduction operator 𝔄_k is invertible for every species-dependent parameter μ_i in [0,1].” strata_touched:

  • D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/LongRangeSwap/LeeCollisionExit
  • D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/LongRangeSwap/LeeReductionInvertibility license: citation-only triage: anchor

Verified locator

DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ae80b5

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12136v1

Crossref identifies the author, title, DOI, and publication in Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2026, 073102. Equation (7), source label 138am42, page 10, defines the local matrices B and B′. Lemma 3.4, equation (26), page 17, gives the adjacent coefficients ℬ_i and ℬ′i. Equation (28), source label 1122am331, defines 𝔄_0 = I and 𝔄_k = I − ℬ{k+1} 𝔄_{k−1}^{−1} ℬ′_k. Remark 3.1 immediately after it, page 18, states:

These results lead us to conjecture that 𝔄_k is invertible for all parameters μ_i ∈ [0,1].

Section 2.3, page 7, states:

The invertibility of the general case (μ_i ∈ (0,1) with arbitrary species composition) remains open due to the complexity of the operators arising in the reduction procedure.

The public encoding uses species Fin N, words Fin n → Fin N, and real matrices indexed by words. For N ≥ 1, n ≥ 2, j ≥ 1, and j + k + 1 ≤ n, claim requires IsUnit (A μ j k) for every parameter vector with 0 ≤ μ a ≤ 1. The adjacent-slot entry rule is the paper’s tensor product in word coordinates, with zero-based slot j + i − 2 corresponding to the paper’s one-based slot j + i − 1.

Proposition 2.2, “Integrability under invertibility”, and the Yang–Baxter result explain the consequence for the source’s reduction to two-particle interactions. The spectral-radius observation in Remark 3.1 is a separate numerical statement and is not an assumption of the invertibility proof.