bibkey: wunderlich2026bsyentropy authors: Henning Wunderlich year: 2026 title: Finite-radius Jensen and relative-entropy formulations of the Balazard–Saias–Yor criterion doi: null url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10584v1 claim: The preprint gives finite-radius Jensen identities and a relative-entropy saturation form of the established Balazard–Saias–Yor criterion; it supplies no Robin divisor-sum estimate or FIB source bridge. strata_touched: [] license: citation-only triage: anchor
Finite-radius Jensen and relative-entropy formulations of the Balazard–Saias–Yor criterion
The source is arXiv:2610.10584v1, submitted 6 October 2026. The paper is a preprint; its cited Jensen–Hardy boundary identities were not independently audited here, and no Lean verification is claimed.
What is explicit
For , the paper maps the unit disk to the left half-plane and applies Jensen’s formula at finite radius. In the normalization centered at , the mapped trivial zeros contribute a telescoping product. The residual is a nonnegative sum or integral over mapped nontrivial zeros off the critical line. The paper also gives a one-parameter gamma-quotient version.
The later construction starts from the established Balazard–Saias–Yor boundary family. Take with the specified density from (8.4), set , and let be its law. With from (8.5) and size-biased law , Theorem 8.2 states
Here is the constant from (8.12), and is the nonnegative off-critical zero correction from (7.9). RH is equivalent to saturation at for these particular measures; Remark 8.3 does not assert the bound for arbitrary probability pairs. The paper stresses that the data-processing equality is unconditional; the RH content is saturation of the external bound, not equality in data processing.
Boundary for the Robin/FIB route
This criterion controls a zero-side logarithmic integral. It does not identify that integral with
at the same integer, nor does it provide a signed estimate for the project’s or Möbius tail. A FIB address supplies an additive Zeckendorf source; this source and the address definitions supply no map to the law of or the required boundary test function. Using the nonnegative Jensen defect as a Robin estimate therefore requires an additional proved correspondence.
The reusable research question is therefore an unproved interface: construct a common, source-preserving transform whose arithmetic projection is the Robin pointwise defect and whose analytic projection is this zero-side defect, with all endpoint and truncation errors retained. No such bridge is supplied by this preprint, so it is not a Robin or RH proof.